Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A scoring for a quantitative evaluation of shock

R Ogawa, T Fujita

    The Japanese Journal of Surgery
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary

    Researchers developed a simple, quantitative "shock score" to evaluate patients in shock. This score analyzes five vital organ functions, providing a severity grade from 0-3 for each, aiding in clinical assessment.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    From subjective judgment to objective analysis - improving child abuse detection in pediatric burns in the Czech Republic.

    Acta chirurgiae plasticae·2025
    Same author

    Treatment with YIGSR peptide ameliorates mouse tail lymphedema by 67 kDa laminin receptor (67LR)-dependent cell-cell adhesion.

    Biochemistry and biophysics reports·2023
    Same author

    Supermicrovascular anastomosis training using chicken wings and colored water.

    Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2023
    Same author

    Extreme acute gastric dilation due to anorexia nervosa.

    Revista de gastroenterologia de Mexico (English)·2022
    Same author

    Incidence and risk factors for hospital-acquired cholecystitis.

    The Journal of hospital infection·2022
    Same author

    Antibiotic use without the diagnosis of specific infectious diseases among aortic dissection patients.

    Infectious diseases now·2022

    Area of Science:

    • Critical Care Medicine
    • Clinical Assessment
    • Physiology

    Background:

    • Shock is a life-threatening condition characterized by inadequate tissue perfusion.
    • Accurate and timely assessment of shock severity is crucial for effective management.
    • Existing methods for shock evaluation may lack simplicity or quantitative precision.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a simple and quantitative scoring system for evaluating the severity of shock.
    • To identify key clinical and laboratory parameters indicative of shock severity.
    • To validate the proposed scoring system in a cohort of patients diagnosed with shock.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of clinical signs, symptoms, and laboratory data from 62 patients diagnosed with shock.
    • Selection of five clinical features representing vital organ functions: systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, hourly urinary output, base excess, and mental state.
    • Grading each feature into four severity stages (0-3) to derive a cumulative 'shock score'.

    Main Results:

    • A novel scoring system, the 'shock score,' was developed based on five key clinical parameters.
    • All 62 patients in the study exhibited a shock score exceeding 5 points.
    • The mean shock score among the patients was 8.0 ± 0.3 (mean ± standard error).

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed 'shock score' offers a simple and quantitative method for assessing shock severity.
    • The scoring system effectively differentiates severity levels based on vital organ function indicators.
    • This tool can aid clinicians in objective shock evaluation and potentially guide therapeutic interventions.

    Related Experiment Videos