Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Joint laxity in selected athletic populations

D A Brodie, H A Bird, V Wright

    Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Free recall measures of short-term store: Are rehearsal and order of recall data necessary?

    Memory & cognition·2013
    Same author

    Isokinetics in the assessment of rehabilitation: a case report.

    Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
    Same author

    Biomechanics and exercise physiology T Johnson John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1991, 493 pp, £66.70.

    Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
    Same author

    Development of a computer system for real-time display and analysis of isokinetic data.

    Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
    Same author

    Total hip replacement in dancers.

    Clinical rheumatology·2013
    Same author

    "Extreme" or tariff sports: their injuries and their prevention (with particular reference to diving, cheerleading, gymnastics, and figure skating).

    Clinical rheumatology·2013

    Common joint laxity measurement methods miss significant athletic differences. A more complex global index method reveals more distinctions in joint laxity among athletes.

    Area of Science:

    • Sports Medicine
    • Biomechanics
    • Orthopedics

    Background:

    • Joint laxity is a critical factor in athletic performance and injury risk.
    • Accurate measurement of joint laxity is essential for understanding biomechanical differences in athletes.
    • Existing methods for assessing joint laxity may not capture the full spectrum of variations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the efficacy of three different measurement methods in detecting significant differences in joint laxity among athletic groups.
    • To evaluate whether commonly used joint laxity assessment tools are sufficient for differentiating athletic populations.

    Main Methods:

    • Ninety-six subjects from six distinct athletic groups were assessed for joint laxity.
    • Three measurement techniques were employed: a hyperextensometer, a generalized joint laxity assessment, and a global index method.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical analysis, including Bonferroni t-statistic, was used to identify significant differences between athletic groups.

    • Main Results:

    • The hyperextensometer method identified two significant differences (P < 0.01) between athletic groups.
    • The generalized joint laxity method detected four significant differences.
    • The global index method revealed seven significant differences, indicating a higher sensitivity in detecting variations.

    Conclusions:

    • Commonly employed methods for measuring joint laxity may underestimate the actual differences between athletic groups.
    • A more comprehensive global index method appears more effective in identifying statistically significant distinctions in joint laxity.
    • Further research should consider advanced methods for a more accurate assessment of joint laxity in athletes.