Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Skoog versus conventional rhytidectomy

D W Foerster

    Annals of Plastic Surgery
    |June 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The Skoog SMAS rhytidectomy shows fewer hematomas but has more revision surgeries and facial nerve injuries compared to conventional rhytidectomy. This facelift technique requires careful consideration of risks versus benefits.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    "False bursa" concept in augmentation mammaplasty.

    Aesthetic plastic surgery·2013
    Same author

    A new method for tightening the orbicularis oculi muscles during blepharoplasty.

    Aesthetic plastic surgery·2013
    Same author

    Changing insurance.

    The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association·1998
    Same author

    Rib cartilage protuberance.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1998
    Same author

    Penile enhancement: another wrong way to go.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1998
    Same author

    Female to male transsexual conversion: a 15-year follow-up.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1983

    Area of Science:

    • Plastic Surgery
    • Facial Rejuvenation Techniques

    Background:

    • The Skoog SMAS rhytidectomy is often considered superior to conventional rhytidectomy.
    • A comparative study is needed to evaluate its safety and efficacy.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare major complications and revision rates between Skoog SMAS rhytidectomy and conventional rhytidectomy.
    • To determine the superior procedure based on complication profiles.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective analysis of patient data comparing two rhytidectomy techniques.
    • Evaluation of major complications, including hematomas and nerve injuries.
    • Assessment of revision surgery rates for unsatisfactory outcomes.

    Main Results:

    • Skoog SMAS rhytidectomy resulted in fewer major hematomas.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • A higher incidence of revision surgeries within the first year was observed for Skoog SMAS rhytidectomy.
  • Significantly more facial nerve injuries were reported with the Skoog SMAS technique.

    • Conclusions:

    • While Skoog SMAS rhytidectomy may reduce hematomas, it is associated with increased risks of revision surgery and facial nerve injury.
    • The perceived superiority of Skoog SMAS rhytidectomy requires re-evaluation considering these complications.