Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Pacemaker implantation inthe pleural cavity (author's transl)]

E Patrón Amador, M Vázquez Flores, A Quintal Flores

    Archivos Del Instituto De Cardiologia De Mexico
    |May 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary

    For patients needing cardiac pacemakers, alternative generator implantations in the left pleural cavity can resolve issues like infections or displacements. This surgical technique offers a solution for complex cases requiring multiple reimplantations.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Double-chamber pacemakers. Implantation in a schoolboy for a traumatic lesion of the conduction tissue].

    Archivos del Instituto de Cardiologia de Mexico·1988
    Same author

    [Electrocardiographic changes in rheumatoid arthritis].

    La Prensa medica mexicana·1978
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cardiology
    • Thoracic Surgery
    • Biomedical Engineering

    Background:

    • Standard pacemaker generator implantation in subcutaneous or subaponeurotic pockets is not always feasible.
    • Complications such as pocket infections, electrode catheter damage, and generator displacement necessitate alternative strategies.

    Observation:

    • This study presents four cases where cardiac pacemaker generators were implanted in the left pleural cavity.
    • The decision was driven by recurrent infections, risk of superficial electrode damage, and generator migration.

    Findings:

    • The left pleural cavity implantation is a viable alternative for complex pacemaker cases.
    • Analysis of indications, surgical techniques, complications, and outcomes is provided.

    Implications:

    • This approach offers a solution for patients experiencing device rejection, chronic infections, or trauma-related issues.
    • It expands the surgical options for managing challenging pacemaker implantations and reimplantations.

    Related Experiment Videos