Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The insanity defense on trial

A A Stone

    Hospital & Community Psychiatry
    |August 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The insanity defense, once a legal hypocrisy, now has genuine meaning due to reforms. Abolishing it faces significant legal and moral challenges despite societal protection concerns.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Tracking quality of life-related outcomes in the U.S. population with monthly PROMIS computerized adaptive testing.

    Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2026
    Same author

    Does humor moderate the effects of experimentally-induced stress?

    Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine·2013
    Same author

    Several daily measurements are necessary to reliably assess the cortisol rise after awakening: state- and trait components.

    Psychoneuroendocrinology·2006
    Same author

    Psychotherapy in the managed care health market.

    Journal of psychiatric practice·2005
    Same author

    Allostatic load, perceived stress, and health: a prospective study in two age groups.

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2005
    Same author

    Does the peak-end phenomenon observed in laboratory pain studies apply to real-world pain in rheumatoid arthritics?

    The journal of pain·2003
    Same journal

    Multiple personality.

    Hospital & community psychiatry·1994
    Same journal

    How to treat inpatients.

    Hospital & community psychiatry·1994
    Same journal

    Folie à deux in identical twins.

    Hospital & community psychiatry·1994
    Same journal

    Psychiatrists' and patients' views on drug information sources and medication compliance.

    Hospital & community psychiatry·1994
    Same journal

    Factors related to psychiatric consultation for schizophrenic patients receiving medical care.

    Hospital & community psychiatry·1994
    Same journal

    An inpatient team's response to alleged sexual misconduct by an outpatient psychotherapist.

    Hospital & community psychiatry·1994
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Forensic Psychiatry
    • Legal Psychology
    • Criminal Law

    Background:

    • The historical relationship between law and psychiatry has deteriorated, leading to calls for abolishing the insanity defense.
    • Critics argue the insanity defense benefits dangerous criminals, involves dishonest expert witnesses, and reflects societal permissiveness.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To rebut common charges against the insanity defense.
    • To analyze the evolution and current state of the insanity defense in legal and psychiatric practice.
    • To explore the legal and moral implications of abolishing the insanity defense.

    Main Methods:

    • Critical analysis of legal rulings and psychiatric practices.
    • Historical review of the insanity defense.
    • Argumentative rebuttal of abolitionist claims.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The author refutes claims that the insanity defense is widely misused by criminals or inherently dishonest.
    • Historically, the defense was a "profound hypocrisy" where acquittals led to indefinite confinement.
    • Recent legal and psychiatric reforms have given the insanity defense genuine significance.

    Conclusions:

    • Despite concerns about societal protection, abolishing the insanity defense presents substantial legal and moral barriers.
    • The evolving nature of the insanity defense necessitates a nuanced understanding beyond simplistic abolitionist arguments.