Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Scope of practice

M S Fish

    Legal Medicine
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Healthcare delivery involves numerous specialists, but unclear authority and responsibility create legal risks. Defining roles ensures accountability and protects both the public and practitioners from legal repercussions.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Euthanasia: where are we? Where are we going?

    Legal medicine·1987
    Same author

    Treatment of the terminally ill.

    JAMA·1983
    Same author

    Euthanasia: where are we? Where are we going?

    The Journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey·1981
    Same author

    Rights and responsibilities of occupational health nurses: the role and need for insurance.

    Occupational health nursing·1977
    Same author

    When does one choose which legal structure in which to practice as a nurse practitioner?

    The Nurse practitioner·1976
    Same author

    What are the legal risks inherent in performing the role of the nurse practitioner?

    The Nurse practitioner·1975

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Administration
    • Medical Law
    • Professional Ethics

    Background:

    • The current healthcare system employs a diverse range of professionals, including physicians, nurses, technicians, and therapists.
    • A significant challenge within this system is the ambiguity surrounding the division of authority, responsibility, and control among these specialists.
    • This lack of clarity impacts quality assurance and legal accountability.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To address the uncertainty in division of authority and responsibility among healthcare professionals.
    • To clarify the legal framework for quality assurance in healthcare.
    • To define lines of accountability for actions within and outside licensed scopes of practice.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of existing healthcare legal and regulatory frameworks.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of professional scopes of practice and licensure requirements.
  • Examination of quality assurance models in healthcare settings.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified significant legal and ethical ambiguities in the division of authority and responsibility.
    • Highlighted the need for clear guidelines to ensure public safety and practitioner protection.
    • Demonstrated the potential for legal and professional consequences due to undefined roles.

    Conclusions:

    • Clear delineation of authority and responsibility is crucial for effective healthcare delivery and quality assurance.
    • Establishing unambiguous legal frameworks protects the public's right to know who is accountable.
    • Practitioners require clear boundaries to avoid legal penalties and protect their licenses.