Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Contrast sensitivity functions and specific reading disability

W Lovegrove, F Martin, A Bowling

    Neuropsychologia
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Changes in network composition among the very old living in inner London.

    Journal of cross-cultural gerontology·2014
    Same author

    The measurement of patients' expectations for health care: a review and psychometric testing of a measure of patients' expectations.

    Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2012
    Same author

    Diagnosis of respiratory viral infections in cystic fibrosis by PCR using sputum samples.

    The European respiratory journal·2011
    Same author

    The Patients Preferences Questionnaire for Angina treatment: results and psychometrics from 383 patients in primary care in England.

    Quality & safety in health care·2010
    Same author

    The effects of question order and response-choice on self-rated health status in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA).

    Journal of epidemiology and community health·2007
    Same author

    Predicting catastrophic decline in mobility among older people.

    Age and ageing·2006
    Same journal

    Prevalence and modulation of rat off-track head scanning on linear tracks: possible implications for representational and dynamic properties of hippocampal place cells.

    Neuropsychologia·2026
    Same journal

    Identifying networks within an fMRI multivariate searchlight analysis.

    Neuropsychologia·2026
    Same journal

    Modulating sentence comprehension in people with aphasia through anodal tDCS: A double-blind randomized cross-over study.

    Neuropsychologia·2026
    Same journal

    Deficient processing of regularity violations during visuospatial neglect: a visual mismatch negativity study.

    Neuropsychologia·2026
    Same journal

    Seeing is believing: mental imagery amplifies moral, emotional, and motivational responding to mentally constructed hypothetical events.

    Neuropsychologia·2026
    Same journal

    From past recall to future projection: What does verb tense production reveal about mental time travel in Alzheimer's disease?

    Neuropsychologia·2026
    See all related articles

    Specifically disabled readers show different contrast sensitivity patterns compared to normal readers. These findings highlight distinct visual mechanisms crucial for reading in individuals with reading disabilities.

    Area of Science:

    • Vision science
    • Reading neuroscience
    • Perceptual psychology

    Background:

    • Reading ability is influenced by visual processing.
    • Understanding visual mechanisms in reading disabilities is crucial for targeted interventions.
    • Contrast sensitivity is a key visual function impacting reading performance.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare contrast sensitivity functions between normal and specifically disabled readers.
    • To identify differences in visual processing mechanisms related to reading difficulties.
    • To provide evidence for distinct visual profiles in reading disabilities.

    Main Methods:

    • Contrast sensitivity functions were measured in two separate experiments.
    • Participants included individuals with specific reading disabilities and a control group of normal readers.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis focused on relative sensitivity across various spatial frequencies.

    • Main Results:

    • Specifically disabled readers exhibited a different pattern of relative contrast sensitivity compared to control readers.
    • Significant differences were observed in the distribution of sensitivity across spatial frequencies.
    • The results indicate variations in fundamental visual mechanisms between the two groups.

    Conclusions:

    • Normal and specifically disabled readers differ in their contrast sensitivity patterns.
    • These differences suggest distinct underlying visual mechanisms essential for effective reading.
    • The study provides empirical evidence supporting visual processing variations in reading disabilities.