Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
Published on: September 8, 2021
A comment on confusion in open-field studies: abuse of null-hypothesis significance test
Abstract:
The confusion in open-field studies which has resulted from a misinterpretation of statistical results was examined. Several discrepant results obtained on the basis of significance tests have revealed that the discrepancy was not so serious as had been thought. Examples of highly reliable but substantially small experimental effects were presented to indicate the erroneous impression given. The expectation that consistent results can always be obtained from even a small sample size was criticized. In order to reduce some of this confusion, the use of strength of association (eta2) together with consideration for statistical power in the interpretation of open-field results was recommended.
Related Concept Videos
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
Significance Testing: Overview
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...

