Related Experiment Videos
Girdlestone arthroplasty for infected total hip arthroplasty
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
|October 1, 1982
Summary
Girdlestone resection arthroplasty after infected total hip replacement offers poor functional outcomes and pain. This salvage technique is often not ideal, even when it
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Arthroplasty
- Infectious Disease Management
Background:
- Infected total hip arthroplasty presents a significant clinical challenge.
- Girdlestone resection arthroplasty is a salvage procedure used after infected total hip removal.
Purpose of the Study:
- To further evaluate the functional salvage value of Girdlestone resection arthroplasty for infected total hip replacements.
- To assess long-term outcomes and patient satisfaction with this procedure.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 14 additional patients undergoing Girdlestone resection arthroplasty for infected total hips.
- Re-evaluation of 21 previously studied patients for long-term functional data.
- Analysis of functional results and pain levels.
Main Results:
- Only one of the 14 reviewed patients achieved an acceptable functional result.
- Long-term functional outcomes for the initial 21 patients remained poor and comparable to the new cohort.
- Girdlestone resection arthroplasty generally yields suboptimal functional results and can be painful.
Conclusions:
- Girdlestone resection arthroplasty is a functionally poor salvage technique for infected total hip arthroplasty.
- While sometimes the best available option, outcomes are often unsatisfactory.
- Alternative procedures like prosthesis exchange, fusion, or osteotomy may be preferable, especially in younger patients.