Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A failure to observe negative preference in infant acuity testing

M S Banks, B R Stephens, J L Dannemiller

    Vision Research
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary

    Infant visual acuity testing using preferential looking methods does not show a "negative preference" effect. Computer simulations suggest an up-down staircase procedure is more efficient for infant psychophysical testing.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Callus and shoot formation in organ and tissue cultures of Hedera helix L., English ivy.

    Planta·2013
    Same author

    Teamwork behaviours and errors during neonatal resuscitation.

    Quality & safety in health care·2010
    Same author

    Perceiving slant about a horizontal axis from stereopsis.

    Journal of vision·2003
    Same author

    Asymmetries in contrast polarity processing in young human infants.

    Journal of vision·2003
    Same author

    Combining sensory information: mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2002
    Same author

    Eye position sense contributes to the judgement of slant.

    Vision research·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Developmental psychology
    • Ophthalmology
    • Visual neuroscience

    Background:

    • Previous studies suggested infants exhibit "negative preference" in visual acuity tests, potentially underestimating results.
    • This phenomenon, a region of below-chance performance, was reported to affect preferential looking experiments.
    • The current study investigates the presence of this negative preference in a specific preferential looking paradigm.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To determine if negative preference is present in the laboratory's preferential looking paradigm for infant visual acuity testing.
    • To compare the efficiency of different psychophysical procedures for infant testing through computer simulations.

    Main Methods:

    • An experiment was conducted to specifically detect negative preference in infant visual acuity testing.
    • Computer simulations were used to model and compare the efficiency of conventional psychophysical procedures, including an up-down staircase method.
    • The Gwiazda et al. (1980) psychophysical procedure was also simulated for comparison.

    Main Results:

    • The experiment did not reveal a significant negative preference in the preferential looking paradigm; results varied randomly around 50% chance performance.
    • Computer simulations indicated that an up-down staircase procedure is more efficient for obtaining accurate infant visual acuity thresholds compared to the Gwiazda et al. procedure.

    Conclusions:

    • The negative preference phenomenon, as described by Held et al. (1979), was not observed in this laboratory's preferential looking paradigm.
    • An up-down staircase procedure is recommended as a more efficient method for infant psychophysical testing, offering accurate threshold estimates.
    • These findings contribute to refining methodologies for assessing infant visual development.

    Related Experiment Videos