Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pattern-evoked potentials and Bloch's law

M J Musselwhite, D A Jeffreys

    Vision Research
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Human visual evoked potentials (VEP) show that C1 and C2 component amplitudes follow contrast rules, but their latencies are independent of stimulus duration, depending solely on contrast. This finding offers new insights into visual processing.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Visual evoked potential evidence for parallel processing of depth- and form-related information in human visual cortex.

    Experimental brain research·1996
    Same author

    Simple methods of identifying the independently generated components of scalp-recorded responses evoked by stationary patterns.

    Experimental brain research·1996
    Same author

    Parotid sialolithiasis in a dog.

    The Journal of small animal practice·1996
    Same author

    The influence of stimulus orientation on the vertex positive scalp potential evoked by faces.

    Experimental brain research·1993
    Same author

    The vertex-positive scalp potential evoked by faces and by objects.

    Experimental brain research·1992
    Same author

    Evoked potential evidence for human brain mechanisms that respond to single, fixated faces.

    Experimental brain research·1992

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Visual Psychophysics
    • Computational Vision

    Background:

    • The contrast equivalent of Bloch's law describes how stimulus contrast and duration interact to affect visual perception.
    • Human pattern-onset visual evoked potentials (VEP) provide a measure of early visual processing.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate whether the latencies of VEP components adhere to the principles of Bloch's law regarding contrast and duration.
    • To compare the behavior of VEP amplitudes and latencies in response to varying stimulus contrast and duration.

    Main Methods:

    • Recording human pattern-onset VEPs.
    • Systematically varying stimulus contrast and duration.
    • Analyzing the amplitude and latency of C1 and C2 VEP components.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • VEP component amplitudes were linearly related to the log of the (contrast X duration) product below a critical duration of 50 msec.
    • VEP component latencies were independent of stimulus duration.
    • VEP component latencies were solely determined by stimulus contrast, increasing with decreased contrast.

    Conclusions:

    • The latencies of human pattern-onset VEP C1 and C2 components do not follow the contrast equivalent of Bloch's law.
    • Stimulus contrast, not duration, is the primary determinant of VEP component latency.
    • These findings suggest distinct neural mechanisms underlying VEP amplitude and latency, with implications for understanding visual information processing.