Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Constrictive pericarditis: new aspects

N O Fowler

    The American Journal of Cardiology
    |November 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This review covers constrictive pericarditis, detailing its causes, signs, and diagnostic methods. It highlights echocardiography and other noninvasive techniques for differentiating it from restrictive cardiomyopathy.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    PRIMARY MYOCARDIAL DISEASE (HEART MUSCLE DISEASE, CARDIOMYOPATHY).

    A listing of research in the cardiovascular field·2014
    Same author

    DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT FACILITIES--COMMUNITY SERVICES.

    A listing of research in the cardiovascular field·2014
    Same author

    Splenomegaly in congestive heart failure.

    Annals of internal medicine·2010
    Same author

    Clinical problem-solving: a broken heart.

    The New England journal of medicine·1996
    Same author

    Constrictive pericarditis: its history and current status.

    Clinical cardiology·1995
    Same author

    Pulsus paradoxus.

    Heart disease and stroke : a journal for primary care physicians·1994
    Same journal

    Real-World Effectiveness and Tolerability of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Octogenarian Patients With Heart Failure: Results From the PARACHUTER Study.

    The American journal of cardiology·2026
    Same journal

    ECG-Guided Conduction Pathways as a Lever to Shorten Post-TAVI Hospitalization.

    The American journal of cardiology·2026
    Same journal

    Cystatin-C versus creatinine and kidney function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a SOGALDI-PEF analysis.

    The American journal of cardiology·2026
    Same journal

    Balloon-expandable versus Self-expanding Valves in Patients with Small Aortic Annuli Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

    The American journal of cardiology·2026
    Same journal

    Drug-Coated Balloons versus Drug-Eluting Stents following Coronary Atherectomy in Severely Calcified Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    The American journal of cardiology·2026
    Same journal

    Prehospital Statin Therapy and Outcomes in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

    The American journal of cardiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cardiology
    • Internal Medicine
    • Medical Diagnostics

    Background:

    • Constrictive pericarditis presents diagnostic challenges, often mimicking other cardiac conditions.
    • Accurate diagnosis is crucial for appropriate management and patient outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review the current understanding of constrictive pericarditis.
    • To delineate diagnostic approaches, including imaging and hemodynamic assessments.
    • To differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of etiology, physical signs, electrocardiographic, and hemodynamic findings.
    • Evaluation of M-mode echocardiography, systolic time intervals, myocardial scanning, and high-speed echocardiography.
    • Discussion of invasive and noninvasive methods for differential diagnosis.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Constrictive pericarditis diagnosis relies on a combination of clinical, electrocardiographic, and hemodynamic data.
    • Echocardiography plays a key role, but its limitations are noted.
    • Distinguishing constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy requires careful integration of multiple diagnostic tools.

    Conclusions:

    • Comprehensive evaluation integrating various diagnostic modalities is essential for constrictive pericarditis.
    • Noninvasive and invasive methods aid in differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
    • Treatment strategies and surgical outcomes for constrictive pericarditis are briefly discussed.