Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Double standards, scientific methods, and epidemiologic research

A R Feinstein, R I Horwitz

    The New England Journal of Medicine
    |December 23, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    THE PRE-THERAPEUTIC CLASSIFICATION OF CO-MORBIDITY IN CHRONIC DISEASE.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same author

    NATURAL HISTORY AND TREATMENT OF RHEUMATIC FEVER.

    A listing of research in the cardiovascular field·2014
    Same author

    II. Treatment and Prevention.

    The Yale journal of biology and medicine·2011
    Same author

    Misguided efforts and future challenges for research on "diagnostic tests".

    Journal of epidemiology and community health·2002
    Same author

    Rigorous new approach to constructing a gold standard for validating new diagnostic criteria, as exemplified by the eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome.

    Archives of internal medicine·2001
    Same author

    The Blame-X syndrome: problems and lessons in nosology, spectrum, and etiology.

    Journal of clinical epidemiology·2001
    Same journal

    Sparganosis.

    The New England journal of medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Caring for an Aging America - The Looming Crisis of the Long-Term-Care Workforce.

    The New England journal of medicine·2026
    Same journal

    For Those Left Behind.

    The New England journal of medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Colliding Forces - The Aging of the Baby Boom Generation and Contracting Nursing-Home Supply.

    The New England journal of medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Mandated State-Level Surveillance of Assisted Reproductive Technology - An Emerging Threat in the United States.

    The New England journal of medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Ebola at 50 - Lessons for Outbreak Response and Preparedness.

    The New England journal of medicine·2026
    See all related articles

    Epidemiologic studies, like cohort and case-control, investigate disease causes when experiments are impossible. Applying rigorous scientific standards to observational research improves the reliability of identifying disease origins.

    Area of Science:

    • Epidemiology
    • Medical Research Methodology

    Background:

    • Investigating disease causes in humans often relies on observational studies due to ethical and practical limitations of experimental testing.
    • Prominent observational study designs include cohort and case-control studies.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the importance of applying fundamental experimental principles to observational epidemiologic research.
    • To emphasize the need for rigorous methodology in identifying disease etiologies.

    Main Methods:

    • Observational study designs (cohort, case-control) are central to epidemiologic investigations.
    • Key principles include data quality verification, bias avoidance, error checking, and distinguishing hypothesis-generating from hypothesis-testing data.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Overlooking basic experimental principles in observational studies can lead to significant methodologic errors.
    • Failure to adhere to standards compromises the accuracy of etiologic findings.

    Conclusions:

    • Epidemiologic research requires strict adherence to scientific rigor, similar to other scientific disciplines.
    • Implementing robust data management and methodological checks is crucial for valid causal inference in observational studies.