Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The emergency department stretcher

E L McNeil

    Annals of Emergency Medicine
    |December 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary

    Emergency department stretchers have design and engineering flaws. Improvements and staff input are crucial for selecting new stretcher equipment.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Lyme disease.

    Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2010
    Same author

    Actin-dependent motility of melanosomes from fish retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells investigated using in vitro motility assays.

    Cell motility and the cytoskeleton·2004
    Same author

    Acute mountain sickness.

    Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·1996
    Same author

    Prone CPR aboard aircraft (McNeil method)

    Journal of emergency nursing·1994
    Same author

    Cardiac resuscitation; a panacea or an ethical decision?

    Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·1991
    Same author

    Re-evaluation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

    Resuscitation·1989

    Area of Science:

    • Emergency Medicine
    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Medical Equipment Design

    Background:

    • Stretchers are vital, high-cost equipment in emergency departments.
    • Current stretcher designs present numerous defects.
    • The selection of new stretchers requires careful consideration.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight design and engineering deficiencies in current stretchers.
    • To propose improvements for stretcher functionality and safety.
    • To emphasize the critical role of emergency department staff in stretcher procurement.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of existing stretcher designs and common issues.
    • Analysis of engineering principles applied to stretcher manufacturing.
    • Incorporation of user feedback from emergency department personnel.

    Main Results:

    • Identification of specific design flaws impacting usability and safety.
    • Recommendations for enhanced features, materials, and ergonomic considerations.
    • Demonstration of how staff expertise can guide better equipment selection.

    Conclusions:

    • Addressing stretcher design flaws can improve patient care and staff efficiency.
    • Collaborative selection processes involving end-users are essential for optimal equipment acquisition.
    • Future stretcher development should prioritize evidence-based design and user-centered innovation.

    Related Experiment Videos