Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How safe is the coronary angiogram?

D F Adams

    Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This review examines complications from selective coronary angiography, finding variations in reported rates. Standardizing the procedure is recommended to improve accuracy and patient safety.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Treatment of periodontitis by local administration of minocycline microspheres: a controlled trial.

    Journal of periodontology·2002
    Same author

    Antenatal therapies and the developing brain.

    Seminars in neonatology : SN·2001
    Same author

    MR imaging-guided percutaneous cryotherapy of liver tumors: initial experience.

    Radiology·2000
    Same author

    Patient and personnel exposure during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures.

    Radiology·2000
    Same author

    The effect of locally delivered controlled-release doxycycline or scaling and root planing on periodontal maintenance patients over 9 months.

    Journal of periodontology·2000
    Same author

    CT fluoroscopy-guided abdominal interventions: techniques, results, and radiation exposure.

    Radiology·1999
    Same journal

    Predictors of Recurrence Following Bronchial Artery Embolisation (BAE) for Haemoptysis: A Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis Analyses Using SWiM Guidelines.

    Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Impact of Artificial Intelligence-Based Triage on Stroke Workflow Metrics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2026
    Same journal

    CIRSE Position Statement on Sustainability in Interventional Radiology.

    Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Optical Navigation Robot-Assisted versus Conventional CT-Guided Localization of Pulmonary Nodules: A Comparison of Efficacy and Analysis of Complication Predictors.

    Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Modified Balloon Technique for Endoluminal Mitomycin-C Delivery in Refractory Esophageal Anastomotic Stricture: A Technical Note.

    Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Should Interventional Radiologists Incorporate Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Into Their Daily Practice? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of IVUS in Peripheral Arterial Endovascular Interventions.

    Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cardiology
    • Medical Imaging
    • Interventional Cardiology

    Background:

    • Selective coronary angiography is a key diagnostic procedure.
    • Complications associated with this invasive examination require careful monitoring.
    • Variations in reported complication rates necessitate further investigation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review the literature on complications of selective coronary angiography.
    • To analyze the incidence of major complications in large patient cohorts.
    • To identify factors influencing discrepancies in reported complication rates.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review of pertinent studies.
    • Comparative analysis of results from three major reports on complication incidence.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Baseline assessment of factors affecting actual versus reported complication rates.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified variations in the reported incidence of major complications.
    • Highlighted the need to understand factors contributing to these discrepancies.
    • Established a baseline for evaluating complication rates in selective coronary angiography.

    Conclusions:

    • Agreement on national standards for performing selective coronary angiography is recommended.
    • Standardization should incorporate the best available data on complication rates.
    • Adopting national standards can lead to more consistent and reliable reporting of procedural safety.