Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Formaldehyde generators: relationship between stability, lipophilicity and carcinogenic potency

J Ashby, P A Lefevre

    Carcinogenesis
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary

    Formaldehyde-releasing agents like methylenedimorpholine (MDM) and hexamethylphosphoramide (HMPA) exhibit varying carcinogenic potentials based on their stability and distribution. Their classification aids in predicting local versus systemic genotoxic activity.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Inspiring a career in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a first-degree medical student's perspective.

    The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2017
    Same author

    The effect on Neisseria gonorrhoeae screening rates in an integrated clinic following the introduction of dual nucleic acid amplification tests.

    International journal of STD & AIDS·2014
    Same author

    Studies in vitro to discern the structural requirements for carcinogenicity in analogues of the carcinogen 4-dimethylaminoazobenzene (butter yellow).

    Carcinogenesis·2012
    Same author

    Evaluation in vitro of several pyrrolizidine alkaloid carcinogens: observations on the essential pyrrolic nucleus.

    Carcinogenesis·2012
    Same author

    HIV testing uptake and acceptability in an inner city polyclinic.

    AIDS care·2012
    Same author

    [Effectiveness of therapeutic erythrocytapheresis to achieve iron depletion in hereditary type 1 hemochromatosis: report of 30 cases].

    Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine·2011

    Area of Science:

    • Toxicology
    • Carcinogenesis
    • Chemical Analysis

    Background:

    • Formaldehyde is a known genotoxic agent and carcinogen.
    • Several chemical compounds release formaldehyde through hydrolysis or enzymatic processes.
    • Understanding the release kinetics and distribution of formaldehyde from these agents is crucial for assessing their toxicological risks.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the formaldehyde release rates of methylenedimorpholine (MDM), hexamethylenetetramine (HMT), and dinitrosopentamethylenetetramine (DNPT).
    • To investigate the enzyme-mediated formaldehyde formation from hexamethylphosphoramide (HMPA).
    • To determine the bio-distribution of [14C]HMPA and compare it with [14C]methyl methanesulphonate (MMS) in rats.
    • To correlate these findings with the carcinogenic and genotoxic properties of the studied chemicals.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of hydrolysis rates of MDM, HMT, and DNPT to formaldehyde.
    • Enzymatic assay for formaldehyde formation from HMPA.
    • Radioisotope ([14C]) tracing to study the bio-distribution of HMPA and MMS in rats following nasal instillation.

    Main Results:

    • MDM showed rapid hydrolysis to formaldehyde, suggesting local activity.
    • HMPA demonstrated lipophilicity and relative stability, with potential for both local and systemic activity.
    • HMT and DNPT exhibited intermediate stability, with limited systemic activity and low local activity.
    • Bio-distribution studies supported the differential systemic exposure potential of HMPA compared to MMS.

    Conclusions:

    • Three classes of formaldehyde-generating agents are proposed based on stability and bio-distribution: labile (local activity), stable (local and systemic activity), and intermediate (limited activity).
    • The classification aids in predicting the carcinogenic and genotoxic risk profiles of these compounds.
    • MDM is likely a local carcinogen, HMPA poses both local and systemic risks, while HMT and DNPT have low carcinogenic potential.