Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Errors of intuitive logic among physicians

J Borak, S Veilleux

    Social Science & Medicine (1982)
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Statistical training for physicians showed limited impact on improving judgmental skills. Even statistically sophisticated physicians exhibited biases in probability judgments, suggesting training alone may not overcome cognitive heuristics.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A luminous blue kilonova and an off-axis jet from a compact binary merger at z = 0.1341.

    Nature communications·2018
    Same author

    Bronchial hyper-responsiveness: a technical update.

    Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2018
    Same author

    Bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

    Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2015
    Same author

    Wind from the black-hole accretion disk driving a molecular outflow in an active galaxy.

    Nature·2015
    Same author

    Is diacetyl a respiratory sensitizer? A reconsideration using QSAR, QMM, and competition experiments.

    Chemical research in toxicology·2013
    Same author

    A massive, cooling-flow-induced starburst in the core of a luminous cluster of galaxies.

    Nature·2012
    Same journal

    Does education shield against vaccine hesitancy? Evidence from the East-West divide.

    Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
    Same journal

    Health inequality aversion in China: Public and decision-maker views.

    Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
    Same journal

    The role of medical evidence certifying PTSD for legal outcomes in Swedish asylum cases 2016-2020.

    Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
    Same journal

    From presence to participation: Ethical engagement in community advisory boards for drug use research.

    Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
    Same journal

    Why we need political values in epidemic modelling: parameters, populations, and public health policy goals.

    Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
    Same journal

    Physical activity, indoor air pollution, and cognitive function among older-adults in India: Evidence of gendered environmental disadvantage.

    Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Medical Education
    • Decision Science

    Background:

    • Physicians' judgmental skills are crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment.
    • Cognitive biases and heuristics can significantly impact clinical decision-making.
    • The effectiveness of statistical and decision-making training on these skills requires further investigation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To assess the impact of statistical and decision-making training on physicians' judgmental skills.
    • To compare the reasoning abilities of statistically sophisticated physicians with other healthcare professionals and laypersons.
    • To identify specific areas where training may or may not improve clinical judgment.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized intuitive logical reasoning problems to evaluate judgmental skills.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared responses from statistically sophisticated physicians (SP), practicing physicians (PP), clinical nurses (CN), and hospital laborers (HL).
  • Assessed performance on problems related to conditional probabilities and prevalence rate data.

    • Main Results:

    • Statistically sophisticated physicians (SP) exhibited the most bias in judgments of conditional probabilities, similar to other groups.
    • SP performed better in using prevalence rate data (34% accuracy) but still showed significant ignorance of these concepts (37%).
    • Intensive training showed limited overall improvement in clinicians' judgmental skills.

    Conclusions:

    • Intensive statistical and decision-making training for physicians offers limited value in enhancing clinical judgmental skills.
    • Cognitive biases, such as heuristic use, persist even with advanced statistical knowledge.
    • Further research is needed to explore more effective strategies for improving clinical decision-making.