Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A note on stratifying versus complete random assignment in clinical trials

J E Grizzle

    Controlled Clinical Trials
    |December 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The Women's Health Trial Feasibility Study in Minority Populations: changes in dietary intakes.

    American journal of epidemiology·1999
    Same author

    The Women's Health Trial Feasibility Study in Minority Populations: design and baseline descriptions.

    Annals of epidemiology·1996
    Same author

    Statistical design and monitoring of the Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial (CARET).

    Controlled clinical trials·1993
    Same author

    Correlated binomial variates: properties of estimator of intraclass correlation and its effect on sample size calculation.

    Statistics in medicine·1992
    Same author

    Analysis of data from multiclinic trials.

    Controlled clinical trials·1987
    Same author

    Additional comments on "some statistical methods useful in circulation research".

    Circulation research·1981
    Same journal

    On the generation and ownership of alpha in medical studies.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    An analysis of the effect of funding source in randomized clinical trials of second generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Symptom recording in a randomised clinical trial: paper diaries vs. electronic or telephone data capture.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Analyzing bronchodilation with emphasis on disease type, age and sex.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Geographic variability in patient characteristics, treatment and outcome in an International Trial of Magnesium in acute myocardial infarction.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    See all related articles

    Stratifying patients by risk factor before randomization is more efficient in small clinical trials than adjusting afterward. For larger trials, both methods offer similar efficiency for treatment comparisons.

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical trial design
    • Biostatistics
    • Statistical efficiency

    Background:

    • Randomization is key in clinical trials to minimize bias.
    • Risk factors can influence treatment outcomes, necessitating careful handling in analysis.
    • Pre-randomization stratification and post-randomization adjustment are two methods to account for risk factors.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the statistical efficiency of two design strategies for handling risk factors in clinical trials.
    • To determine the impact of sample size on the efficiency of pre-randomization stratification versus post-randomization adjustment.

    Main Methods:

    • Calculating the variance of the estimated difference between two treatment means.
    • Comparing variances for pre-randomization stratification and post-randomization adjustment strategies.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzing efficiency across different sample sizes (small, moderate, large).

    • Main Results:

    • Pre-randomization stratification demonstrates higher efficiency in small sample sizes.
    • Post-randomization stratification leads to a significant loss of efficiency in small samples.
    • In moderate and large samples, both design strategies yield similar variances, indicating comparable efficiency.

    Conclusions:

    • Pre-randomization stratification is recommended for small clinical trials to maximize statistical power.
    • The choice between pre-randomization stratification and post-randomization adjustment has minimal impact on efficiency in larger trials.
    • Careful consideration of sample size is crucial when deciding on the optimal strategy for handling risk factors in clinical trial design.