Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laterality effects in cued auditory asymmetries

R S Dean, M S Hua

    Neuropsychologia
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Cued attention impacts perceptual asymmetries differently based on individual brain lateralization. Right-lateralized individuals showed little change, while mixed/left-lateralized subjects improved stimulus recognition when attention was directed.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    What outcomes should be measured in feline chronic kidney disease treatment trials? Establishing a core outcome set for research.

    Preventive veterinary medicine·2021
    Same author

    A systematic review of the quality of life assessment tools for cats in the published literature.

    Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2021
    Same author

    Measuring the success of canine and feline preventative healthcare consultations: A systematic review.

    Preventive veterinary medicine·2018
    Same author

    Sample size and number of outcome measures of veterinary randomised controlled trials of pharmaceutical interventions funded by different sources, a cross-sectional study.

    BMC veterinary research·2017
    Same author

    Sponsorship bias and quality of randomised controlled trials in veterinary medicine.

    BMC veterinary research·2017
    Same author

    Common decisions made and actions taken during small-animal consultations at eight first-opinion practices in the United Kingdom.

    Preventive veterinary medicine·2017
    Same journal

    Prevalence and modulation of rat off-track head scanning on linear tracks: possible implications for representational and dynamic properties of hippocampal place cells.

    Neuropsychologia·2026
    Same journal

    Identifying networks within an fMRI multivariate searchlight analysis.

    Neuropsychologia·2026
    Same journal

    Modulating sentence comprehension in people with aphasia through anodal tDCS: A double-blind randomized cross-over study.

    Neuropsychologia·2026
    Same journal

    Deficient processing of regularity violations during visuospatial neglect: a visual mismatch negativity study.

    Neuropsychologia·2026
    Same journal

    Seeing is believing: mental imagery amplifies moral, emotional, and motivational responding to mentally constructed hypothetical events.

    Neuropsychologia·2026
    Same journal

    From past recall to future projection: What does verb tense production reveal about mental time travel in Alzheimer's disease?

    Neuropsychologia·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Neuroscience
    • Psychology
    • Neuroscience

    Background:

    • Perceptual asymmetries, such as the right-ear advantage in auditory processing, are well-documented.
    • Individual differences in brain lateralization may influence these asymmetries.
    • The role of cued attention in modulating these effects requires further investigation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate how cued attention affects perceptual asymmetries in individuals with varying lateral preferences.
    • To determine if directing attention influences auditory stimulus recognition differently across lateralization patterns.

    Main Methods:

    • Participants were classified as right-lateralized or mixed/left-lateralized based on visual-motor tasks.
    • Dichotically presented verbal stimuli were used, with attention cued to the left, right, or both ears.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimulus recognition accuracy was measured under different attention conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • For right-lateralized subjects, cued attention had minimal impact on the typical right-ear advantage.
    • Mixed/left-lateralized subjects demonstrated significantly improved stimulus recognition in the cued ear.
    • This suggests that attentional control over perceptual asymmetries varies with individual lateralization.

    Conclusions:

    • Brain lateralization plays a crucial role in how individuals utilize cued attention to modulate perceptual asymmetries.
    • Mixed/left-lateralized individuals appear more flexible in reallocating attentional resources for auditory processing.
    • Findings contribute to understanding the neural basis of attention and perception.