Related Experiment Videos
Do adjacent joints compensate for decreased mobility in a cervical spine segment?
Zeitschrift Fur Rheumatologie
|November 1, 1982
Summary
Adjacent spinal segments do not compensate for reduced mobility. Instead, decreased mobility in one cervical spine level correlates with reduced mobility in neighboring segments, challenging existing theories.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Spinal Biomechanics
- Pathology
Background:
- Understanding cervical spine biomechanics is crucial for diagnosing and treating spinal disorders.
- Previous research suggested adjacent motion segments might compensate for reduced mobility at a specific level.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether adjacent motion segments compensate for loss of mobility in the cervical spine.
- To analyze pathological and kinesiological data from autopsy specimens.
Main Methods:
- Combined pathological and kinesiological investigation of autopsy specimens.
- Analysis of mobility in segments adjacent to a low-mobile level.
- Assessment of disk degeneration and mobility variation.
Main Results:
- No evidence of compensatory hypermobility in adjacent segments was found.
- A positive correlation of decreased mobility was observed between adjacent segments.
- Disk splits and increased mobility variation did not compensate for reduced mobility.
Conclusions:
- Adjacent cervical spine segments do not exhibit compensatory hypermobility.
- Decreased mobility in one segment is associated with decreased mobility in neighboring segments.
- Degenerative lesions contribute to this correlation, but an independent mechanism may also exist.