Optimal allocation for the comparison of proportions
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Abstract:
Optimal allocation strategies for the comparison of proportions, p1 and p2, in two groups are discussed. Allocations which (i) maximize the precision in the estimation of the difference p1-p2, (ii) maximize the precision in the estimation of the ratio p1/p2, (iii) maximize the power to detect a group difference, and (iv) minimize the total cost of a study are compared. The recommended allocation varies markedly with the desired objective. Furthermore, there is a wide range of allocation schemes which are effectively optimal with regard to each criterion considered. A study of congenital malformations occurring in pregnancies of diabetic women is used to illustrate how these considerations apply to the planning of a study.
Related Concept Videos
Sample Proportion and Population Proportion
Test for Homogeneity
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Bonferroni Test
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

