Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Skin testing with simple equipment in photodermatoses

E van Hecke

    Contact Dermatitis
    |November 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Light testing identified abnormal results in 36% of dermatitis patients, revealing photoallergy and UV sensitivity. Polymorphic light eruption patients showed normal responses, indicating distinct light-related skin conditions.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Live birth in patients stimulated with r-hFSH or r-hFSH: r-hLH is strongly associated with cumulus cell derived gene expression models.

    Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E·2025
    Same author

    Impact of a pulsed electric field on damage of plant tissues: effects of cell size and tissue electrical conductivity.

    Journal of food science·2011
    Same author

    Contact and photocontact allergy to ketoprofen. The Belgian experience.

    Contact dermatitis·2004
    Same author

    Cutaneous manifestations of internal diseases.

    Acta clinica Belgica·2004
    Same author

    Pesticides and mortality from hormone-dependent cancers.

    European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)·2001
    Same author

    Renal function, cytogenetic measurements, and sexual development in adolescents in relation to environmental pollutants: a feasibility study of biomarkers.

    Lancet (London, England)·2001
    Same journal

    Contact Allergy and Allergic Contact Dermatitis From Propylene Glycol and Related Glycols: Cosmetic Skin Sensitisers After All?

    Contact dermatitis·2026
    Same journal

    AI-Assisted Automated Two-Stage Patch Test Interpretation System Using Vision Transformer.

    Contact dermatitis·2026
    Same journal

    Fragrance and Preservative Contact Allergens in Cosmetic and Household Cleaning Products in Turkey: Variation by Target Population, Product Type and Manufacturing Origin.

    Contact dermatitis·2026
    Same journal

    European Society of Contact Dermatitis Guideline for Diagnostic Patch Testing-Recommendations on Best Practice (Update 2026).

    Contact dermatitis·2026
    Same journal

    Patch Test Reactions to Dental Materials: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study.

    Contact dermatitis·2026
    Same journal

    Methylchloroisothiazolinone and Methylisothiazolinone 10 Years After Regulation: A Case Story of Liquid Soaps and Shampoos.

    Contact dermatitis·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Dermatology
    • Photobiology
    • Clinical Immunology

    Background:

    • Photodermatoses are common skin conditions triggered by light exposure.
    • Accurate diagnosis of light-induced skin reactions is crucial for effective management.
    • Light testing plays a role in differentiating various photosensitive disorders.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the diagnostic utility of light testing in patients with suspected photodermatoses.
    • To identify patterns of abnormal light test results in different groups of patients.
    • To evaluate the correlation between clinical presentation and objective light sensitivity measurements.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective review of 275 patients undergoing light testing over a 10-year period (1972-1981).
    • Categorization of patients based on referral diagnosis (e.g., eczematous dermatitis, polymorphic light eruption).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of light test results, including photoallergy and UV sensitivity, and correlation with clinical findings and patch testing.

    • Main Results:

    • Abnormal light test results were observed in 36% of dermatitis patients, with photoallergy (17 patients) and UV sensitivity (30 patients) being common findings.
    • Patients with polymorphic light eruption consistently showed normal light test responses.
    • Abnormal tests were also noted in solar urticaria, phototoxic reactions, acne-like folliculitis, and systemic lupus erythematosus.
    • Seven of ten patients reacting to phenothiazines had abnormal light test results.
    • A high prevalence of contact sensitivity was found in UV-sensitive patients via patch testing.

    Conclusions:

    • Light testing is valuable for diagnosing photoallergic and UV-sensitive conditions, differentiating them from polymorphic light eruption.
    • Normal light test results in polymorphic light eruption suggest a different pathomechanism.
    • Abnormal light sensitivity can be associated with various dermatoses beyond typical photodermatoses.
    • Coexisting contact sensitivity is frequent in UV-sensitive individuals, highlighting the need for comprehensive allergy assessment.