Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A model for predicting clinically relevant group differences of open-response tests

H N Gutnick, R St John

    Journal of Speech and Hearing Research
    |September 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Letter to the Editor.

    American journal of audiology·2015
    Same author

    West Nile Encephalitis: What it could mean to Canadian paediatricians in the summer of 2000.

    Paediatrics & child health·2010
    Same author

    Bioterrorism in Canada: An economic assessment of prevention and postattack response.

    The Canadian journal of infectious diseases = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses·2007
    Same author

    Transference and countertransference contributions toward understanding the phenomenon of institutionalization of schizophrenic patients.

    The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis·2001
    Same author

    Practices in the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism.

    Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis·2000
    Same author

    Transfusion-transmitted malaria in Canada.

    Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada·1999

    This study compares group mean differences with individual classification using speech-discrimination tests. It highlights the difference between statistically significant results and clinically meaningful classification accuracy, discussing misclassification probabilities.

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Biostatistics
    • Speech-Language Pathology

    Background:

    • Group mean comparisons and individual classification are distinct statistical goals.
    • Speech-discrimination tests are crucial for assessing auditory function.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare statistical methods for group mean differences versus individual classification.
    • To differentiate statistical significance from clinical utility in speech-discrimination testing.
    • To analyze probabilities of misclassification in individual subject assignment.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative statistical analysis.
    • Evaluation of speech-discrimination test metrics.
    • Probability analysis of misclassification errors.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Statistical differences in sample means do not always equate to effective individual classification.
    • Clinical utility requires careful consideration beyond mere statistical significance.
    • Misclassification probabilities vary depending on test parameters and criteria.

    Conclusions:

    • Distinguishing between group-level statistical significance and individual diagnostic accuracy is essential.
    • Clinical application of speech-discrimination tests necessitates evaluating their ability to correctly classify individuals.
    • Understanding and minimizing misclassification probabilities are critical for accurate patient assessment.