Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Parameters of auditory feedback

G M Siegel, E J Schork, H L Pick

    Journal of Speech and Hearing Research
    |September 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Integrating basic and applied developmental research: a new model for the twenty-first century.

    Child development·2000
    Same author

    Stimulation of spinach (Spinacia oleracea) chloroplast fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase by mercuric ions.

    FEBS letters·1997
    Same author

    Control of children's stuttering with response-contingent time-out: behavioral, perceptual, and acoustic data.

    Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·1997
    Same author

    Interjudge agreement in videofluoroscopic studies of swallowing.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same author

    Effects of distance on vocal intensity.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1995
    Same author

    Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1995
    Same journal

    Temporal resolution in infancy and subsequent language development.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    Evidence of sensitivity to structural contrasts in the literature on children's language comprehension.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    Narrative development in late talkers: early school age.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    A system for the diagnosis of specific language impairment in kindergarten children.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    Interactive focused stimulation for toddlers with expressive vocabulary delays.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    Auditory lexical decisions of children with specific language impairment.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    See all related articles

    Different auditory feedback methods impact speech differently. Vocal intensity changed with all methods, but only delayed auditory feedback (DAF) altered syllable rate, showing feedback specificity.

    Area of Science:

    • Speech production and acoustics
    • Auditory feedback mechanisms
    • Vocal control in adult speakers

    Background:

    • Auditory feedback is crucial for speech regulation.
    • Various methods exist to manipulate auditory feedback.
    • Understanding these manipulations' effects is key to speech science.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the distinct effects of three auditory feedback conditions on adult speech.
    • To determine if different feedback methods yield comparable results.
    • To assess the generalizability of findings across feedback types and speech parameters.

    Main Methods:

    • Adult speakers were exposed to three auditory feedback conditions: Lombard effect, sidetone amplification, and delayed auditory feedback (DAF).
    • Vocal intensity and syllable rate were measured under each condition.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical analyses were performed to compare effects across conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • All three feedback conditions significantly altered vocal intensity.
    • Only delayed auditory feedback (DAF) resulted in significant changes to syllable rate.
    • Performance across the different feedback conditions was not correlated, indicating unique effects.

    Conclusions:

    • The effects of auditory feedback on speech are method-dependent.
    • Delayed auditory feedback (DAF) uniquely influences speech rate.
    • Generalizing findings about auditory feedback requires consideration of the specific technique and speech parameter investigated.