Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Measurement of speech reception threshold. A comparison between two methods

B Hagerman

    Scandinavian Audiology
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary

    A new 2 X 4-word method for speech reception threshold (SRT) testing requires fewer words and is more reliable than the common 10-word method, according to simulations and clinical investigation.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Sound quality judgment during acclimatization of hearing aid.

    Scandinavian audiology·1997
    Same author

    Attempts to develop an efficient speech test in fully modulated noise.

    Scandinavian audiology·1997
    Same author

    Efficient adaptive methods for measuring speech reception threshold in quiet and in noise.

    Scandinavian audiology·1995
    Same author

    Efficiency of speech audiometry and other tests.

    British journal of audiology·1993
    Same author

    Perceived sound quality in a hearing aid with vented and closed earmould equalized in frequency response.

    Scandinavian audiology·1992
    Same author

    [Interpret carefully hearing measurements].

    Lakartidningen·1991

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Speech-Language Pathology

    Background:

    • The speech reception threshold (SRT) is a key audiological measure.
    • Traditional SRT methods, like the 10-word method, have been widely used but may not be the most efficient.
    • Computer simulations have explored alternative SRT methodologies.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the efficacy and reliability of a novel 2 X 4-word method against the conventional 10-word method for assessing speech reception threshold.
    • To evaluate the performance of different SRT methods through computer simulations and clinical investigation.

    Main Methods:

    • Computer simulations were employed to model and assess various speech reception threshold (SRT) testing procedures.
    • A clinical investigation directly compared the newly developed 2 X 4-word method with the standard 10-word method.
    • The number of words required and the reliability of each method were key metrics.

    Main Results:

    • The 2 X 4-word method demonstrated superior efficiency by requiring significantly fewer words compared to the 10-word method.
    • Computer simulations indicated that the 2 X 4-word method offers improved reliability over the traditional 10-word approach.
    • Clinical findings corroborated the efficiency gains observed in simulations.

    Conclusions:

    • The 2 X 4-word method represents a more efficient and reliable approach for determining speech reception thresholds in clinical settings.
    • This novel method has the potential to streamline audiological assessments and improve patient outcomes.
    • Further research may explore the broader applicability and validation of the 2 X 4-word SRT method.

    Related Experiment Videos