Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Primal therapy--a clinically confirmed procedure?]

U Ehebald, H V Werthmann

    Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychoanalyse
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary

    Primal therapy lacks scientific validation and is not recognized as a legitimate therapeutic technique by the scientific community. Legal and clinical evaluations indicate it is not a form of psychoanalytic therapy and its efficacy remains questionable.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Dinosaurs and pussycats. Psychoanalysis in difficulty?].

    Psyche·1984
    Same author

    [Use of the Hempel-Oppenheim schema of scientific explanation in psychoanalysis].

    Psyche·1982
    Same author

    [Training of psychology students in psychotherapy (author's transl)].

    Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie·1981
    Same author

    [The physician and the offers of the psychomarket].

    MMW, Munchener medizinische Wochenschrift·1981
    Same author

    [Client centered psychotherapy].

    Zeitschrift fur Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychoanalyse·1979
    Same author

    [Behavior therapy].

    Zeitschrift fur Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychoanalyse·1979

    Area of Science:

    • Psychotherapy Research
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Medical Ethics

    Context:

    • Legal proceedings questioned the scientific validity of primal therapy for insurance coverage.
    • Courts required an assessment of primal therapy's recognition as a scientific therapeutic process.

    Purpose:

    • To evaluate the scientific standing and therapeutic validity of primal therapy.
    • To determine if primal therapy aligns with established psychotherapeutic principles and evidence-based practices.

    Summary:

    • Literature review concluded primal therapy is not a valid therapeutic technique.
    • Primal therapy is not discussed in scientific psychotherapeutic literature; lacks outcome data, statistical, and follow-up studies.
    • German psychotherapists view primal therapy as theoretically questionable and practically dangerous, rarely utilizing it.

    Impact:

    • Highlights the lack of scientific evidence supporting primal therapy.
    • Informs legal and clinical decisions regarding insurance coverage for unvalidated therapies.
    • Raises concerns about the safety and efficacy of primal therapy, particularly when practiced by laypersons.

    Related Experiment Videos