Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Experimental models for testing respiratory tract carcinogens

U Mohr

    Cancer Detection and Prevention
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Quality management system and accreditation of the in vivo monitoring laboratory at Karslruhe Institute of Technology.

    Radiation protection dosimetry·2010
    Same author

    Development of a cell culture model system for routine testing of substances inducing oxidative stress.

    Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA·2010
    Same author

    Re: Comments on paper by Son et al.

    Toxicology letters·2005
    Same author

    PRV-1 mRNA expression discriminates two types of essential thrombocythemia.

    Annals of hematology·2004
    Same author

    Inhalation toxicity of propineb. Part II: Results of mechanistic studies in rats.

    Inhalation toxicology·2003
    Same author

    In vitro genotoxicity assay of sidestream smoke using a human bronchial epithelial cell line.

    Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2002
    Same journal

    Melanoma metastasis to the breast: a diagnostic pitfall.

    Cancer detection and prevention·2009
    Same journal

    Development of a rat model by 3,4-benzopyrene intra-pulmonary injection and evaluation of the effect of green tea drinking on p53 and bcl-2 expression in lung carcinoma.

    Cancer detection and prevention·2009
    Same journal

    Combined effect of NAT2, MTR and MTHFR genotypes and tobacco on bladder cancer susceptibility in Tunisian population.

    Cancer detection and prevention·2009
    Same journal

    Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism(s) and breast cancer risk in north Indians.

    Cancer detection and prevention·2009
    Same journal

    Epidemiology of primary brain tumors in the Middle Eastern population in California, USA 2001-2005.

    Cancer detection and prevention·2009
    Same journal

    Lifetime consumption of alcoholic beverages and risk of 13 types of cancer in men: results from a case-control study in Montreal.

    Cancer detection and prevention·2009
    See all related articles

    Evaluating rodent models like mice, rats, and hamsters is crucial for respiratory cancer research. Different exposure methods offer unique insights but have limitations when extrapolating findings to human respiratory tract cancer development.

    Area of Science:

    • Toxicology
    • Oncology
    • Comparative Medicine

    Background:

    • Rodent models are frequently used in respiratory tract cancer research.
    • Understanding the efficacy of these models is essential for accurate risk assessment.
    • Environmental chemicals pose a significant risk for respiratory carcinogenesis.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the utility of mouse, rat, and Syrian golden hamster models for respiratory tract cancer studies.
    • To compare different exposure methods for assessing environmental chemical effects on the respiratory tract.
    • To determine the validity of data extrapolation from animal models to humans.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of existing investigations on respiratory tract cancer induction in rodents.
    • Discussion of implantation, intratracheal instillation, and inhalation as exposure techniques.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of animal models and exposure methods against human data.

    • Main Results:

    • Each exposure method (implantation, intratracheal instillation, inhalation) presents distinct advantages and disadvantages.
    • Variability exists in the suitability of different species (mouse, rat, hamster) for specific research questions.
    • Current methods require careful consideration for accurate extrapolation to human respiratory carcinogenesis.

    Conclusions:

    • Mouse, rat, and hamster models offer valuable, albeit imperfect, platforms for respiratory cancer research.
    • The choice of exposure method significantly impacts the relevance and validity of study findings.
    • Further refinement of animal models and exposure techniques is needed to improve extrapolation to human health risks.