Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Statistics in medical journals

D G Altman

    Statistics in Medicine
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Poor statistical reporting in medical journals is common, leading to scientific and ethical issues. Improving statistical refereeing in journals is crucial for enhancing the quality of published medical research.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    CONSORT 2010 statement: extension checklist for reporting within person randomised trials.

    The British journal of dermatology·2019
    Same author

    'Allocation concealment': the evolution and adoption of a methodological term.

    Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2018
    Same author

    [Better Reporting of Interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) Checklist and Guide].

    Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·2018
    Same author

    GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.

    Research involvement and engagement·2017
    Same author

    GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2017
    Same author

    Quality control of ultrasound for fetal biometry: results from the INTERGROWTH-21<sup>st</sup> Project.

    Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2017
    Same journal

    Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Research
    • Biostatistics
    • Scientific Publishing

    Background:

    • The standard of statistical reporting in medical journals is frequently inadequate.
    • Common statistical errors in published medical literature are prevalent.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the reasons behind poor statistical practices in medical journals.
    • To discuss the scientific and ethical consequences of statistical errors.
    • To propose improvements for statistical reporting standards.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of common statistical errors in medical publications.
    • Review of the impact of incorrect statistics on research integrity.
    • Formulation of recommendations for enhancing statistical quality control.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Identified widespread statistical inaccuracies in medical journals.
    • Highlighted significant scientific and ethical implications arising from these errors.
    • Emphasized the need for rigorous statistical review processes.

    Conclusions:

    • The quality of statistical reporting in medical journals requires urgent attention.
    • Implementing robust statistical refereeing is essential for improving research validity.
    • Addressing statistical deficiencies will uphold scientific and ethical standards in medical publications.