Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026
Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Determinants of neurobehavioral outcome in low-birth-weights infants
Insights
Head circumference at birth is the most critical predictor of neurobehavioral outcomes in low-birth-weight infants. Smaller head size, regardless of birth weight or gestational age, is linked to poorer developmental and neurological assessments.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Development
- Pediatric Neurology
- Developmental Psychology
Background:
- Assessing neurobehavioral outcomes in low-birth-weight infants is crucial for early intervention.
- Understanding predictors of neurodevelopmental trajectories informs clinical practice.
- Previous studies have examined birth weight and gestational age, but the role of head circumference needs further clarification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the relative importance of birth measurements in predicting neurobehavioral outcome.
- To compare the predictive value of absolute birth parameters versus their appropriateness for gestational age.
- To identify key factors influencing neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated 127 low-birth-weight infants at 7 months corrected age.
- Utilized Bayley Scales of Infant Development and neurologic examinations.
- Correlated birth weight, gestational age, and head circumference (absolute and SGA-adjusted) with neurobehavioral scores.
Main Results:
- Lower birth weight, shorter gestational age, and smaller head circumference correlated with poorer neurobehavioral outcomes.
- Infants with small head circumference for gestational age had significantly higher rates of low Mental Development Index scores and severe neurologic deficits.
- Small-for-gestational-age infants without small head circumference showed similar outcomes to appropriate-for-gestational-age infants.
Conclusions:
- Head circumference at birth is the most significant predictor of neurobehavioral outcome in low-birth-weight infants.
- Birth weight and gestational age may serve as indirect indicators of fetal head growth.
- Focusing on fetal head growth assessment could improve prediction of neurodevelopmental trajectories.
Abstract:
The relative importance of (1) birth weight, gestational age, and head circumference at birth, and (2) appropriateness of birth weight and head circumference to gestational age in the predictability of neurobehavioral outcome was evaluated in 127 low-birth-weight infants at 7 months of age. Lower absolute birth weights, shorter gestational ages, and smaller head circumferences at birth correlated with poorer outcome (Bayley Scales of Infant Development and abnormal neurologic examination) at the corrected chronologic age of 7 months (r = .28 to .42, all P less than .005). The incidence of low scores on the Mental Development Index and of severe neurologic deficit was significantly higher in small head circumference for gestational age infants than in appropriate head circumference for gestational age infants (both, P less than .05). In the absence of small head circumference, small for gestational age infants had similar incidences of low Bayley scores and abnormal neurologic examinations as did appropriate for gestational age infants. These observations suggest that head circumference at birth may be the single most important variable for subsequent neurobehavioral outcome, and that both birth weight and gestational age may simply be markers of fetal head growth in their relationship to later outcome.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Environmental Influences on Intelligence
01:30Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings.