Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Motivating autistic children through stimulus variation

G Dunlap, R L Koegel

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

|January 1, 1980

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Identifying early intervention targets for children with autism in inclusive school settings.

Behavior modification·2001

Same author

Including children with autism in general education classrooms. A review of effective strategies.

Behavior modification·2001

Same author

Construction of adulthood and disability.

Mental retardation·2001

Same author

Pivotal areas in intervention for autism.

Journal of clinical child psychology·2001

Same author

International publication trends of JABA authorship.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2000

Same author

Pivotal responses and the natural language teaching paradigm.

Seminars in speech and language·1998

Same journal

Latency and persistence of renewal in an intensive outpatient clinic.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026

Same journal

The effect of varied versus constant high-probability instructional sequences on cooperation.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026

Same journal

Relations between heart rate and precursors: A replication and extension of prior research.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026

Same journal

Integrating five linear trend techniques into performance-criteria-based effect size measurements: Impressions and recommendations.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026

Same journal

Functional analysis and treatment of higher level restricted repetitive behavior displayed by individuals with autism.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026

Same journal

Contingency drives children's vocal behavior.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026

See all related articles

Varying tasks during teaching improves learning for autistic children. Interspersing activities reduces boredom, leading to better engagement and sustained performance compared to constant task presentation.

Area of Science:

Developmental Psychology
Behavioral Analysis
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research

Background:

Traditional teaching methods for autistic children often involve presenting a single task repeatedly within a session.
The potential impact of boredom on learning and behavior in autistic children is not fully understood.
Understanding optimal task presentation is crucial for effective educational interventions for autism.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the effectiveness of constant versus varied task presentation methods in teaching discrimination skills to autistic children.
To assess the influence of task variation on children's behavioral engagement and learning outcomes.
To explore the role of stimulus novelty and variation in the context of autism intervention.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluated two conditions: constant task presentation and varied task presentation (interspersed with other curriculum tasks).
Measured correct responding rates during discrimination tasks under both conditions.
Collected observational data on children's enthusiasm, interest, happiness, and behavior from naive observers.

Main Results:

Autistic children showed declining correct responding in the constant task condition.
Substantially improved and stable responding was observed during the varied task condition.
Naive observers rated children as more enthusiastic, interested, happier, and better behaved during varied task sessions.

Conclusions:

Varying tasks is more effective than constant task presentation for teaching discrimination skills to autistic children.
Boredom appears to be a significant factor influencing learning and behavior in this population.
Careful consideration of task acquisition criteria and the benefits of stimulus variation are recommended for autism interventions.