Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quantitative bone assessments: applications and expectations

R B Sandler, D L Herbert

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
    |March 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Funding for cerebral palsy research in Australia, 2000-2015: an observational study.

    BMJ open·2016
    Same author

    Legal Aspects of Cardiac Rehabilitation Exercise Programs.

    The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
    Same author

    Preparticipation cardiovascular screening: toward a national standard.

    The Physician and sportsmedicine·2010
    Same author

    Practice guidelines take center court: how to limit liability.

    The Physician and sportsmedicine·2010
    Same author

    Calculation of cross-sectional geometry of bone from CT images with application in postmenopausal women.

    Journal of computer assisted tomography·1994
    Same author

    The effects of feedback on the behavior of depressed inpatients in two structured interactions.

    Behavior modification·1992
    Same journal

    Caregiver Burden at the Onset of Acute Hospital-At-Home.

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2026
    Same journal

    Utilization Patterns Among Heterogeneous Subgroups of Homebound Older Adults: A Latent Class Analysis.

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2026
    Same journal

    Off-Label Initiation of Gabapentin and Valproic Acid Among Long-Stay Nursing Home Residents With and Without Dementia.

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2026
    Same journal

    The DOAC-FRAIL Study-Same Dose, Different Story: Prevalence of Deviant Direct Oral Anticoagulant Levels in Nursing Home Residents.

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2026
    Same journal

    Practice Environment and Job Outcomes Among Primary Care Nurse Practitioners Caring for Patients With Dementia.

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2026
    Same journal

    Anticholinergic Medication Use in Veterans Affairs Long-Term Care Residents: Clinical Patterns and Opportunities for Deprescribing.

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2026
    See all related articles

    Radiologic methods precisely measure bone mass but cannot predict osteoporotic fractures due to limitations in assessing axial, trabecular bone and variations in body composition. Bone density monitoring remains crucial for tracking skeletal changes.

    Area of Science:

    • Radiology
    • Orthopedics
    • Endocrinology

    Background:

    • Advanced radiologic methods improve bone mass measurement precision.
    • Osteoporotic fractures remain difficult to predict accurately.
    • Current limitations stem from measurement focus and population variability.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the predictive capabilities of current bone mass measurement techniques for osteoporotic fractures.
    • To identify the reasons behind the inability to predict fracture risk.
    • To clarify the role of bone density measurements in clinical practice.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of current radiologic methods for bone mass measurement.
    • Analysis of bone composition (cortical vs. trabecular) and skeletal location (appendicular vs. axial).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Consideration of inter-individual variability in bone density due to body habitus.

    • Main Results:

    • Radiologic methods accurately measure bone mass in appendicular (cortical) bone but not axial (trabecular) bone.
    • Most critical fractures occur in the axial skeleton involving trabecular bone, which is more susceptible to bone loss.
    • Significant variations in normal bone density ranges exist across different body compositions within similar demographics.

    Conclusions:

    • Current bone density measurements cannot reliably predict the imminence of osteoporotic fractures.
    • Limitations include the inability to accurately assess axial trabecular bone and account for body habitus variations.
    • Bone density measurements are valuable for monitoring skeletal mass changes for therapeutic and prophylactic management.