Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hypothesis testing in neurosurgical trials

N Sundaresan, R Voorhies, K L Kwok

    Journal of Neurosurgery
    |April 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    High-flow nasal cannula therapy for children and adolescents with obstructive sleep apnoea: abridged secondary publication.

    Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi·2025
    Same author

    Hamiltonian Engineering with Multicolor Drives for Fast Entangling Gates and Quantum Crosstalk Cancellation.

    Physical review letters·2022
    Same author

    Megalencephalic Leucoencephalopathy [Van Der Knaap Disease] in a Non Agarwal Family.

    The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India·2018
    Same author

    Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Following Varicella Infection.

    The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India·2016
    Same author

    Prospective assessment of white matter integrity in adult stem cell transplant recipients.

    Brain imaging and behavior·2015
    Same author

    A prospective evaluation of changes in brain structure and cognitive functions in adult stem cell transplant recipients.

    Brain imaging and behavior·2013
    Same journal

    Extent of resection as an independent predictor of survival for patients with glioblastoma as defined by the new WHO 2021 classification.

    Journal of neurosurgery·2026
    Same journal

    Surgical treatment of schwannomas around the tarsal tunnel: a case series of 40 patients and systematic review of the literature.

    Journal of neurosurgery·2026
    Same journal

    Direct targeting for focused ultrasound thalamotomy in the treatment of movement disorders.

    Journal of neurosurgery·2026
    Same journal

    Development and internal validation of the Meningioma Functional Outcome Risk and Counseling Estimator 6 score, a point-based prognostic tool for predicting 6-week functional independence after intracranial meningioma resection.

    Journal of neurosurgery·2026
    Same journal

    Connectional anatomy of the cerebellum: dentate nucleus and cerebellar peduncles from a surgical perspective.

    Journal of neurosurgery·2026
    Same journal

    Press releases in neurosurgery: is scientific accuracy compromised in public reporting of neurosurgery research?

    Journal of neurosurgery·2026
    See all related articles

    Most neurosurgical trials have a high risk of Type II errors due to small sample sizes. This means treatments may appear similar when they are actually different, impacting treatment evaluation.

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical Trials Methodology
    • Statistical Inference in Medicine
    • Neurosurgical Research

    Background:

    • Controlled clinical trials are the gold standard for treatment evaluation.
    • Trial design must account for Type I and Type II statistical errors.
    • Type I error: falsely detecting a treatment difference. Type II error: failing to detect a real treatment difference.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To assess the adequacy of sample sizes in neurosurgical trials.
    • To determine the prevalence of unacceptable Type II error probabilities in these studies.

    Main Methods:

    • Survey of recently conducted neurosurgical clinical trials.
    • Analysis of statistical power and sample size calculations for each trial.
    • Evaluation of the probability of committing Type II errors based on reported sample sizes.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • A significant proportion of surveyed neurosurgical trials utilized inadequate sample sizes.
    • The majority of these trials exhibited an unacceptably high probability of Type II errors.
    • Insufficient sample sizes compromise the ability to detect true treatment effects.

    Conclusions:

    • Many neurosurgical trials are underpowered, increasing the risk of Type II errors.
    • Inadequate sample sizes in clinical trials can lead to erroneous conclusions about treatment efficacy.
    • Future neurosurgical trial designs must prioritize sufficient sample sizes to ensure reliable results.