Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Nasal reconstruction

P J Gullane

    The Journal of Otolaryngology
    |December 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Nasal reconstruction has advanced significantly, with reconstruction superior to prostheses for most defects. However, prostheses may be preferred for total nasal loss.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Correlation between clinical and MRI assessment of depth of invasion in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

    Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale·2016
    Same author

    Outcome of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma in patients with and without known risk factors.

    Oral oncology·2010
    Same author

    Multicentricity in papillary thyroid carcinoma: analysis of predictive factors.

    The Journal of otolaryngology·2002
    Same author

    Role of the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap preventing Frey's syndrome and maintaining facial contour following superficial parotidectomy.

    The Journal of otolaryngology·2002
    Same author

    A patient- and observer-rated analysis of the impact of lateral rhinotomy on facial aesthetics.

    Archives of facial plastic surgery·2001
    Same author

    Resurfacing of the nasopharynx after nasopharyngectomy using a free radial forearm flap.

    Head & neck·2001
    Same journal

    Primary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the submandibular gland: unique presentation and surprising treatment response.

    The Journal of otolaryngology·2008
    Same journal

    Hearing recovery after meningitis.

    The Journal of otolaryngology·2008
    Same journal

    Endoscopic transnasal sphenopalatine arterial ligation for intractable posterior epistaxis in a young child.

    The Journal of otolaryngology·2008
    Same journal

    [Non-functional parathyroid cyst].

    The Journal of otolaryngology·2008
    Same journal

    Cacosmia secondary to an olfactory groove meningioma.

    The Journal of otolaryngology·2008
    Same journal

    Hemangioma of the vocal cords: review of two cases.

    The Journal of otolaryngology·2008
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Plastic Surgery
    • Otolaryngology
    • Reconstructive Surgery

    Background:

    • Nasal reconstruction techniques have evolved over the last 50 years.
    • Understanding defect evaluation, including primary versus delayed reconstruction, is crucial.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review the advancements in nasal reconstruction.
    • To compare reconstruction methods versus prostheses for various nasal defects.
    • To outline available rehabilitation modalities.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of reconstructive techniques for nasal defects.
    • Comparison of surgical reconstruction versus prosthetic options.
    • Analysis of rehabilitation modalities including flaps and grafts.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Surgical reconstruction is generally superior to prostheses for heminasal and sub-total nasal defects.
    • Prosthetic rehabilitation may be the preferred option for complete nasal loss.
    • Various reconstructive options exist, including local flaps, regional flaps, and autogenous grafts.

    Conclusions:

    • Nasal reconstruction offers superior outcomes for most defects compared to prostheses.
    • The choice between reconstruction and prosthesis depends on the extent of nasal loss.
    • Autogenous grafts and flaps provide versatile solutions for nasal defect repair.