Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Client participation in CMHC program evaluation: increasing incidence, inadequate involvement

C Windle, N C Paschall

    Community Mental Health Journal
    |January 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Assessment of cage use by laboratory-bred common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

    Laboratory animals·1998
    Same author

    NIMH support of rural mental health.

    The American psychologist·1991
    Same author

    Treatment of patients with no diagnosable mental disorders in CMHCs.

    Hospital & community psychiatry·1988
    Same author

    Types of patients served by various providers of outpatient care in CMHCs.

    The American journal of psychiatry·1988
    Same author

    The impact of federally funded CMHCs on local mental health service systems. Community Mental Health Centers.

    Hospital & community psychiatry·1987
    Same author

    The contrasting careers of two structural types of CMHCs.

    Community mental health journal·1985

    Community mental health centers (CMHCs) use client feedback systems, but clients rarely participate in designing them. Increased client involvement in evaluations can improve services and ensure programs meet client needs.

    Area of Science:

    • Social Sciences
    • Public Health
    • Health Services Research

    Background:

    • Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs) are mandated to assess service acceptability following 1975 amendments.
    • Current evaluation methods, including satisfaction surveys and complaint systems, involve limited client input.
    • Clients are seldom actively involved in the design or administration of these assessments.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To advocate for greater client control in designing and administering service evaluations.
    • To explore the technical and political justifications for increased client involvement.
    • To demonstrate how enhanced client participation can lead to more effective program improvements.

    Main Methods:

    • The study presents a critical analysis of existing client feedback mechanisms within CMHCs.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • It reviews the historical context of service evaluation requirements for CMHCs.
  • The authors draw upon theoretical arguments regarding client empowerment and program effectiveness.

    • Main Results:

    • Despite the implementation of client feedback systems, active client participation in evaluation design and administration remains minimal.
    • There is a recognized need for greater client control over the evaluation process.
    • Current evaluation practices may not fully capture the client's perspective on service acceptability.

    Conclusions:

    • Greater client control over satisfaction surveys and complaint systems is technically and politically warranted.
    • Involving clients more directly in evaluation processes is likely to result in more meaningful program improvements.
    • Empowering clients in service evaluation can enhance the overall effectiveness and responsiveness of community mental health services.