Cefadroxil monohydrate versus erythromycin in paediatric patients
Insights
Cefadroxil monohydrate demonstrated higher efficacy than erythromycin estolate in treating pediatric upper respiratory tract infections, achieving a 95% cure rate. This study highlights cefadroxil
Area of Science:
- Pediatric infectious diseases
- Pharmacology
- Microbiology
Background:
- Upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) are common in children.
- Antibiotic resistance is a growing concern in treating bacterial infections.
- Cephalosporins and macrolides are frequently used antibiotics for URTIs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of cefadroxil monohydrate versus erythromycin estolate in treating pediatric URTIs.
- To evaluate clinical and bacteriological cure rates for both antibiotic treatments.
- To assess the impact of antibiotic resistance on treatment outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving forty pediatric patients with URTIs.
- Patients were randomized into two groups: twenty receiving cefadroxil monohydrate and twenty receiving erythromycin estolate.
- Both drugs were administered orally at 50 mg/kg/day, divided into two doses every 12 hours.
Main Results:
- Cefadroxil monohydrate achieved a complete cure rate of 95%, compared to 80% for erythromycin estolate.
- Two patients treated with erythromycin estolate showed no improvement due to S. aureus resistant to erythromycin; they were successfully treated with cefadroxil.
- In scarlet fever cases, cefadroxil demonstrated superior bacteriological eradication compared to erythromycin.
Conclusions:
- Cefadroxil monohydrate is a highly effective treatment for pediatric URTIs, showing better efficacy than erythromycin estolate.
- The study underscores the importance of considering bacterial resistance patterns, such as erythromycin resistance in S. aureus.
- Cefadroxil monohydrate offers a reliable therapeutic option for pediatric URTIs, including those caused by resistant pathogens.
Abstract:
Cefadroxil monohydrate, an oral cephalosporin with a long half-life, was compared to erythromycin estolate for efficacy in treating upper respiratory tract infections in children. The study was carried out on forty patients, twenty receiving cefadroxil and twenty receiving erythromycin. Each drug was dosed at 50 mg/kg/day and was given every 12 hours in two equally divided doses. The complete cure rate was 95% for the cefadroxil group and 80% for the erythromycin group. Two patients originally in the erythromycin test group showed no improvement either bacteriologically or clinically after 3 days of treatment. It was found that these patients harboured S. aureus which had become resistant to erythromycin during the course of therapy. Both patients were shifted to cefadroxil treatment and achieved complete cures. Two patients in the erythromycin group and one in the cefadroxil group were diagnosed as having scarlet fever. All three responded clinically, yet cultures from the two treated with erythromycin showed persistence of bacteria while the one treated with cefadroxil proved to be cured both clinically and bacteriologically.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Inhibitors of Bacterial DNA Synthesis


