Related Experiment Videos
Problems with the measurement of radiological change
IARC Scientific Publications
|January 1, 1980
Summary
Inconsistent readings of asbestos worker chest X-rays (radiographs of pneumoconioses) were found due to independent film analysis. Accumulating and reading films together is crucial for valid results in occupational health surveillance.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health
- Radiology
- Environmental Medicine
Background:
- Chest X-rays were collected from asbestos workers in British factories between 1971-1978.
- The study involved 36,592 X-rays from 26,471 workers, following the 1969 Asbestos Regulations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the consistency and validity of pneumoconiosis classification from chest X-rays in an occupational cohort.
- To identify factors contributing to inconsistencies in reading radiographic films.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the 1971 International Labour Organization (ILO) Classification of Radiographs of Pneumoconioses.
- Compared results from a pilot study using a 'side-by-side' reading method with a main survey where films were read independently and shortly after collection.
Main Results:
- Serious inconsistencies were observed in the main survey compared to the pilot study.
- A bias towards classifying films into lower ILO/UC categories was evident as the survey progressed.
- Independent reading of different X-rays from the same worker, potentially by different readers, contributed to variability.
Conclusions:
- Accumulating a set of films and reading them together over a short period is essential for obtaining valid results in pneumoconiosis assessment.
- Future re-reading of a sample of collected films will incorporate these findings to improve accuracy.