Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison between hydrogen clearance and microsphere technique for rCBF measurement

W D Heiss, H Traupe

    Stroke
    |March 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary

    Comparing two methods for measuring regional cerebral blood flow in cats, researchers found that while both hydrogen clearance and microsphere techniques showed comparable results in normal tissue, they differed significantly during ischemia and reperfusion. Method selection is crucial for accurate cerebral blood flow studies.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Personal, financial and time burden in inherited ichthyoses: A survey of 144 patients in a university-based setting.

    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2024
    Same author

    Proposal for a 6-step approach for differential diagnosis of neonatal erythroderma.

    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2022
    Same author

    Quality of life and clinical characteristics of self-improving congenital ichthyosis within the disease spectrum of autosomal-recessive congenital ichthyosis.

    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2021
    Same author

    Development of a pathogenesis-based therapy for peeling skin syndrome type 1.

    The British journal of dermatology·2020
    Same author

    Response to dupilumab in two children with Netherton syndrome: Improvement of pruritus and scaling.

    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2020
    Same author

    A rose is a rose: naevoid manifestations blur the boundary between naevus and classical gene defect in focal dermal hypoplasia.

    The British journal of dermatology·2019

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Physiology
    • Medical Imaging

    Background:

    • Accurate measurement of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) is critical for understanding brain function and disease.
    • Various techniques exist for measuring rCBF, each with inherent strengths and limitations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the reliability and comparability of two methods for measuring regional cerebral blood flow in cats: inhaled hydrogen (H2) clearance and radiolabeled 15 mu microsphere distribution.
    • To evaluate the performance of these methods under normal physiological conditions and during induced ischemia and reperfusion.

    Main Methods:

    • Regional cerebral blood flow was measured in anesthetized cats using both H2-clearance with platinum electrodes and microsphere distribution with three different radioisotopes.
    • Measurements were taken under various experimental conditions, including normal cortical tissue, induced ischemia, and post-ischemic reperfusion.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Both methods yielded comparable rCBF values in normal cortical tissue (H2-clearance: 75.7 +/- 23.5 ml/100 g/min; microspheres: 67.6 +/- 26.2 ml/100 g/min) and showed good reproducibility.
    • During ischemia, microspheres often reported higher flow than H2-clearance, failing to detect severe ischemia in some instances.
    • Post-reperfusion, microspheres detected hyperperfusion in fewer cases than H2-clearance, with an overall low correlation (0.486) between methods under pathological conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • The H2-clearance and microsphere techniques for measuring rCBF exhibit limited comparability, particularly under pathological conditions like ischemia and reperfusion.
    • Discrepancies are likely due to differences in recording volumes, with microspheres potentially averaging over heterogeneous flow patterns.
    • The choice of method for cerebral blood flow assessment should be guided by the specific experimental requirements and the known limitations of each technique.