Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Experience with special-type pacemaker leads (author's transl)]

J Bücking, U Hahner, J Stein

    Zeitschrift Fur Kardiologie
    |March 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Advance care planning in the palliative phase of people with intellectual disabilities: analysis of medical files and interviews.

    Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2019
    Same author

    Measurement of the [Formula: see text] production cross-section in proton-proton collisions via the decay [Formula: see text].

    The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
    Same author

    Opposite-side flavour tagging of <i>B</i> mesons at the LHCb experiment.

    The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
    Same author

    Measurement of <b></b> production in <b></b> collisions at [Formula: see text].

    The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
    Same author

    Search for charged Higgs bosons in e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>-</sup> collisions at [Formula: see text].

    The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
    Same author

    Measurement of <i>ψ</i>(2<i>S</i>) meson production in <i>pp</i> collisions at [Formula: see text].

    The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
    Same journal

    [Not Available].

    Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie·2016
    Same journal

    [Not Available].

    Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie·2016
    Same journal

    [On pathogenesis of coronary heart disease].

    Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie·2016
    Same journal

    An overview of the evolution of the atherosclerotic plaque: from fatty streak to plaque rupture and thrombosis.

    Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie·2016
    Same journal

    [Not Available].

    Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie·2016
    Same journal

    [Reconstructive surgery of the aortic root].

    Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie·2016
    See all related articles

    Specialized pacemaker leads can reduce dislodgement rates. While some special electrodes showed higher complication rates, porous tip leads demonstrated promising results with minimal dislodgement and no sensing or pacing failures.

    Area of Science:

    • Cardiovascular medicine
    • Biomedical engineering
    • Implantable electronic devices

    Context:

    • Pacemaker lead dislodgement is a significant complication.
    • Evaluating the efficacy of various pacemaker lead designs is crucial for patient safety.
    • Over 2100 pacemaker implantations performed since 1963.

    Purpose:

    • To assess the dislodgement and complication rates of different endocardial pacemaker lead types.
    • To identify lead designs that minimize complications and improve patient outcomes.
    • To compare the performance of traditional leads with newer screw-in and porous tip designs.

    Summary:

    • A retrospective analysis of pacemaker leads implanted between 1974-1978 revealed varying complication rates.
    • Special-type electrodes, including IE--65--I, IVE--85--, and IE--60--KS--10, showed higher revision rates compared to standard leads.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Screw-in leads (Medtronik 6957, Biotronik AE--60--YR) had a low complication rate, with only one fatal perforation.
  • Porous tip leads (CPII--4116) showed excellent initial results, with 2 dislodgements in 50 implantations and no sensing or pacing failures.

    • Impact:

    • Identifies specific pacemaker lead designs associated with higher complication risks.
    • Highlights the potential of screw-in and porous tip leads as safer alternatives.
    • Provides evidence-based recommendations for selecting pacemaker leads to improve patient safety and reduce revision rates.