Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

07:47
Experimental Human Pneumococcal Carriage
Published on: February 15, 2013
Validation of sources of pertussis immunisation data
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
|December 1, 1980
Summary
Parental records were the most reliable source for whooping cough immunisation data in West Glamorgan. General practitioner data was least reliable, while area health authority data requires sufficient processing time for future studies.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Immunisation Data Validation
Background:
- Accurate immunisation records are crucial for epidemiological studies, particularly for vaccine-preventable diseases like whooping cough (pertussis).
- West Glamorgan initiated a study on whooping cough, necessitating the validation of available immunisation data sources.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate and compare the reliability of three distinct sources of immunisation data.
- To determine the most accurate data source for future epidemiological research on whooping cough in the study region.
Main Methods:
- Validation of immunisation data from three sources: general practitioners, parents, and the area health authority.
- Comparative analysis of data accuracy and completeness across the identified sources.
Main Results:
- Parental records emerged as the most reliable source for whooping cough immunisation status.
- General practitioner records were found to be the least reliable data source.
- Area health authority data is viable for future studies if adequate time is allocated for data compilation and computerisation.
Conclusions:
- The reliability of immunisation data varies significantly between sources.
- Parental recall provides a highly accurate method for documenting immunisation history in whooping cough studies.
- Area health authority data can be effectively utilised with proper logistical planning for data management.

