Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Different levels in processing simple geometrical figures

S Bagnara, S Roncato, F Simion

    Perceptual and Motor Skills
    |October 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Enhancing the quality and reproducibility of research: Preferred Evaluation of Cognitive and Neuropsychological Studies - The PECANS statement for human studies.

    Behavior research methods·2025
    Same author

    First Constraints on the Epoch of Reionization Using the Non-Gaussianity of the Kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect from the South Pole Telescope and Herschel-SPIRE Observations.

    Physical review letters·2024
    Same author

    Sensitivity to the role of an animated agent from observed interactions in newborn chicks (<i>Gallus gallus</i>).

    Royal Society open science·2023
    Same author

    Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season.

    Physical review letters·2021
    Same author

    Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves Using Planck, WMAP, and New BICEP2/Keck Observations through the 2015 Season.

    Physical review letters·2018
    Same author

    N2pc reflects two modes for coding the number of visual targets.

    Psychophysiology·2018
    Same journal

    Theoretical and Psychological Mechanisms of Perceptual-Motor Learning in AI Bots-Assisted Art Education.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Development and Measurement Properties of a Custom-Built Punch Force Dynamometer Based on S-Type Load Cells.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Do Elite Taekwondo Athletes Invest Time for Better Choices? Analysis of Anticipatory Behavior Through a Perception-Action Coupling Task.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Multisensory Contributions in Joint Actions: A Scoping Review.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Proprioceptive Impairment and Joint Position Exposure Time in Relation to Patient-Report Outcome With Chronic Ankle Instability.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Static Tactical Diagrams and Imagination: Differential Effects on Novice and Expert Handball Players.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    See all related articles

    This study extends cognitive psychology's levels of processing theory to geometrical shapes. Findings show distinct processing levels apply to visual-geometric judgments, not just letters.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Visual Perception
    • Experimental Psychology

    Background:

    • Prior research established levels of processing for alphabetical material (Posner, 1969).
    • The applicability of these processing levels to non-alphabetical stimuli remained underexplored.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate if different levels of cognitive processing, akin to those found for letters, extend to geometrical figures.
    • To test the hypothesis that visual-geometric stimuli are processed at varying depths.

    Main Methods:

    • Pairs of simple geometrical figures (triangles, trapezoids) were presented using tachistoscopic methods.
    • Participants judged pairs as "same" or "different" based on shape or name congruence.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Results indicated that participants processed geometrical figures at different cognitive levels.
    • The criteria for judging figures as "same" (shape vs. name) influenced processing depth.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings support the generalization of levels of processing theory to the domain of geometrical figures.
    • Cognitive processing of visual-geometric information is not monolithic and occurs at multiple levels.