Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sequential clinical trials for normal variates using interval composite hypotheses

J M Lachin

    Biometrics
    |March 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study explores composite hypotheses in sequential clinical trials, improving patient safety monitoring. The weighted likelihood ratio unifies sequential probability ratio tests and Bayes formulations for robust trial analysis.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Effect of GLP-1 and GIP on C-peptide secretion after glucagon or mixed meal tests: Significance in assessing B-cell function in diabetes.

    Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews·2017
    Same author

    Application of robust estimating equations to the analysis of quantitative longitudinal data.

    Statistics in medicine·2001
    Same author

    A flexible stochastic curtailing procedure for the log-rank test.

    Controlled clinical trials·2000
    Same author

    Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle.

    Controlled clinical trials·2000
    Same author

    Worst-rank score analysis with informatively missing observations in clinical trials.

    Controlled clinical trials·1999
    Same author

    Group sequential monitoring of distribution-free analyses of repeated measures.

    Statistics in medicine·1997

    Area of Science:

    • Biostatistics
    • Clinical Trial Methodology
    • Medical Ethics

    Background:

    • Sequential methods are vital for patient safety in clinical trials.
    • The standard Wald sequential probability ratio test (SPRT) has limitations with simple hypotheses.
    • Composite hypotheses offer a more robust framework for sequential trial analysis.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore composite null and alternative hypotheses in sequential clinical trials.
    • To examine the resulting sequential rules and their equivalence to existing methods.
    • To provide a unified framework for analyzing sequential trial data.

    Main Methods:

    • The study examines the weighted likelihood ratio (WLR) for normal variates under various composite hypotheses.
    • It demonstrates the equivalence between SPRT and Bayes formulations using Bayes odds ratios via WLR.
    • Applications are illustrated for large-sample procedures, binomial trials, and survival distribution comparisons.

    Main Results:

    • The weighted likelihood ratio (WLR) provides a unified approach for sequential analysis.
    • Composite hypotheses address limitations of simple hypotheses in SPRT.
    • The study presents practical applications and comparative analyses of different sequential formulations.

    Conclusions:

    • Composite hypotheses enhance the reliability of sequential methods in clinical trials.
    • The WLR framework offers a versatile tool for analyzing diverse clinical trial designs.
    • This research contributes to more ethical and efficient clinical trial monitoring.

    Related Experiment Videos