Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating clinical programs: methodological guidelines

A Fink, J Kosecoff

    Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy
    |July 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Use of a tibial osseointegrated prosthesis as a limb salvage method in two dogs.

    Australian veterinary journal·2025
    Same author

    Detection of minimal residual disease and prediction of recurrence in breast cancer using a plasma-only circulating tumor DNA assay.

    ESMO open·2025
    Same author

    The efficacy of sacituzumab govitecan and trastuzumab deruxtecan on stable and active brain metastases in metastatic breast cancer patients-a multicenter real-world analysis.

    ESMO open·2024
    Same author

    Prevention of severe immune-related colitis caused by combined immune checkpoint inhibition using vedolizumab: A case report.

    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2023
    Same author

    Hyperprogression of Merkel cell carcinoma after avelumab treatment.

    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2023
    Same author

    Lower cognitive reappraisal capacity is related to impairments in attachment and personality structure in poly-drug use: an fMRI study.

    Brain imaging and behavior·2020
    Same journal

    Profile of prescription medication in a pediatric population.

    Drug intelligence & clinical pharmacy·1988
    Same journal

    SI units in drug therapeutics.

    Drug intelligence & clinical pharmacy·1988
    Same journal

    Physicians' review of significant interventions by clinical pharmacists in inpatient care.

    Drug intelligence & clinical pharmacy·1988
    Same journal

    Possible interaction of ranitidine with phenytoin.

    Drug intelligence & clinical pharmacy·1988
    Same journal

    Famotidine-associated mental confusion in elderly patients.

    Drug intelligence & clinical pharmacy·1988
    Same journal

    Intravenous self-administration of elemental mercury: efficacy of dimercaprol therapy.

    Drug intelligence & clinical pharmacy·1988
    See all related articles

    This article outlines criteria for conducting reliable clinical program evaluations. It covers essential steps from posing questions to reporting data for credible assessments.

    Area of Science:

    • Health Services Research
    • Program Evaluation Methodology

    Background:

    • Clinical program evaluations are crucial for assessing program goals, processes, outcomes, impact, and costs.
    • Ensuring the reliability and credibility of these evaluations is paramount for evidence-based decision-making.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To provide essential criteria for conducting robust and credible evaluations of clinical programs.
    • To guide researchers and practitioners in systematically investigating program merits.

    Main Methods:

    • Defining criteria for formulating relevant evaluation questions.
    • Establishing guidelines for appropriate sample selection and research design.
    • Outlining best practices for data collection, analysis, interpretation, and reporting.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The article presents a framework for systematic evaluation.
    • Key criteria are provided for each stage of the evaluation process.

    Conclusions:

    • Adherence to the outlined criteria enhances the reliability and credibility of clinical program evaluations.
    • This systematic approach supports informed decision-making regarding clinical programs.