Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Aged and error differences on Memory-for-Designs

W H Riege, K Kelly, L T Klane

    Perceptual and Motor Skills
    |April 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Healthcare should be accessible for all: development of the ObServation Tool and Resource for Inclusive Communication in Healthcare (OSTRICH).

    Disability and rehabilitation·2026
    Same author

    Global advances and future directions in lung cancer care: expert consensus and strategic priorities.

    ESMO open·2026
    Same author

    Lung cancer research and treatment: global perspectives and strategic calls to action.

    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2024
    Same author

    An interprofessional clinic for adults with Turner syndrome: the patient perspective.

    Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society·2022
    Same author

    Corrigendum to "The incidence, aetiology, and coagulation management of massive postpartum haemorrhage: a two-year national prospective cohort study" [Int J Obstet Anesth. 2021;47:102983].

    International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2022
    Same author

    The incidence, aetiology, and coagulation management of massive postpartum haemorrhage: a two-year national prospective cohort study.

    International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2021
    Same journal

    Theoretical and Psychological Mechanisms of Perceptual-Motor Learning in AI Bots-Assisted Art Education.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Development and Measurement Properties of a Custom-Built Punch Force Dynamometer Based on S-Type Load Cells.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Do Elite Taekwondo Athletes Invest Time for Better Choices? Analysis of Anticipatory Behavior Through a Perception-Action Coupling Task.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Multisensory Contributions in Joint Actions: A Scoping Review.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Proprioceptive Impairment and Joint Position Exposure Time in Relation to Patient-Report Outcome With Chronic Ankle Instability.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Static Tactical Diagrams and Imagination: Differential Effects on Novice and Expert Handball Players.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    See all related articles

    Age significantly impacts visual memory performance. Older adults made more omission and distortion errors on the Memory-for-Designs test, while younger adults showed more reversal errors, highlighting age-related memory changes.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Neuroscience
    • Human Development

    Background:

    • Assessing visual memory across the adult lifespan is crucial for understanding cognitive aging.
    • Traditional scoring methods for visual memory tests may not fully capture age-related differences.
    • The Memory-for-Designs test is a tool used to evaluate visual memory capabilities.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the relationship between age and performance on the Memory-for-Designs test.
    • To evaluate a novel error category scoring method for its sensitivity to age-related visual memory changes.
    • To establish age norms for the Memory-for-Designs test using the enhanced scoring technique.

    Main Methods:

    • 120 volunteers aged 20-84 years were administered the Memory-for-Designs test.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Performance was scored using the Graham-Kendall method and a modified six-category error analysis (reversal, distortion, omission, rotation, embellishment, perseveration).
  • Inter-rater reliability was assessed, and performance was compared with the WAIS Block Design test.

    • Main Results:

    • Age reliably predicted overall performance on the Memory-for-Designs test.
    • The error category scoring revealed significant age interactions: older adults (>60) made more omission/distortion errors, while younger adults (<40) made more reversal errors.
    • The modified scoring method was more sensitive to age differences in visual memory than the Graham-Kendall method and provided valuable age norms.

    Conclusions:

    • Age-related differences in visual memory are evident in specific error patterns on the Memory-for-Designs test.
    • The novel error category scoring system offers a more nuanced and sensitive measure of visual memory compared to traditional methods.
    • This study provides essential age norms for the Memory-for-Designs test, aiding in clinical and research applications.