Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reproducibility of gamma camera data

W R Pitt, P F Sharp

    Physics in Medicine and Biology
    |July 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Quantifying nuclear medicine images involves errors. Source size and depth in tissue-equivalent medium significantly increase measurement errors, impacting diagnostic accuracy.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    External quality assurance for image grading in the Scottish Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programme.

    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2011
    Same author

    Vitamin C content of market milk, evaporated milk, and powdered whole milk.

    The Journal of nutrition·2010
    Same author

    Costs and consequences of automated algorithms versus manual grading for the detection of referable diabetic retinopathy.

    The British journal of ophthalmology·2009
    Same author

    Cost-effectiveness of implementing automated grading within the national screening programme for diabetic retinopathy in Scotland.

    The British journal of ophthalmology·2007
    Same author

    The efficacy of automated "disease/no disease" grading for diabetic retinopathy in a systematic screening programme.

    The British journal of ophthalmology·2007
    Same author

    Paediatric research in emergency departments international collaborative (predict).

    Journal of paediatrics and child health·2006
    Same journal

    Effective contrast-enhanced preprocessing for intracranial artery segmentation in digital subtraction angiography.

    Physics in medicine and biology·2026
    Same journal

    Improving Plan Quality in Adaptive Proton Therapy Using an Interactive Dose Modification Tool.

    Physics in medicine and biology·2026
    Same journal

    Technical Note: Real-Time MLC Control and Latency Measurement Optimization with External Verification.

    Physics in medicine and biology·2026
    Same journal

    Fetus-Specific Hematopoietic Stem Cell Dosimetry Framework for Leukemia-Relevant Target Cells During Prenatal Development.

    Physics in medicine and biology·2026
    Same journal

    Deep learning-based dose prediction to enhance planning efficiency in cervical brachytherapy with hybrid applicators.

    Physics in medicine and biology·2026
    Same journal

    Corrigendum: Referenceless MR thermometry-a comparison of five methods (2017<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>62</b>1-16).

    Physics in medicine and biology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Nuclear Medicine Imaging
    • Medical Physics
    • Radiopharmaceutical Quantification

    Background:

    • Accurate quantification in nuclear medicine imaging is crucial for clinical diagnosis.
    • Understanding associated errors is essential for reliable image interpretation.
    • Increasing use of quantitative methods necessitates error analysis.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate errors in estimating activity in nuclear medicine images.
    • To assess the impact of source size, position, and depth on measurement accuracy.
    • To investigate the effect of flood correction techniques on quantification errors.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized sources with known cross-sectional areas (1-25 cm²).
    • Evaluated errors from count rate variations, measurement day, and source position.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Investigated source depth effects in tissue-equivalent (TE) medium.
  • Assessed two flood correction techniques: 'count-skipping' and matrix division.

    • Main Results:

    • Camera response variations introduce at least 6% error (SD) for a given source size and depth.
    • Error increases with larger source size or greater depth in TE medium.
    • Inaccurate estimation of organ depth is a significant error source.
    • Flood correction techniques increased error primarily for the smallest sources.

    Conclusions:

    • Source size and depth are critical factors influencing quantification accuracy in nuclear medicine.
    • Precise determination of source depth is vital to minimize diagnostic errors.
    • Standard flood correction methods may introduce additional errors for small sources.