Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Securing patients' rights--responsibly

Hospital & Community Psychiatry

|June 1, 1981

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Patient advocates wield significant power but may lack clinical understanding, risking harm to severely mentally ill individuals. Responsible advocacy requires clinical experience and rigorous screening to protect vulnerable patients.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The argument against primary prevention.

The journal of primary prevention·2013

Same author

Response to drs. Albee and goldston.

The journal of primary prevention·2013

Same author

The new state mental hospitals in the community.

New directions for mental health services·2001

Same author

Persons with severe mental illness in jails and prisons: a review.

New directions for mental health services·2001

Same author

Deinstitutionalization at the beginning of the new millennium.

New directions for mental health services·2001

Same author

Community treatment of severely mentally ill offenders under the jurisdiction of the criminal justice system: a review.

New directions for mental health services·2001

Same journal

Multiple personality.

Hospital & community psychiatry·1994

Same journal

How to treat inpatients.

Hospital & community psychiatry·1994

Same journal

Folie à deux in identical twins.

Hospital & community psychiatry·1994

Same journal

Psychiatrists' and patients' views on drug information sources and medication compliance.

Hospital & community psychiatry·1994

Same journal

Factors related to psychiatric consultation for schizophrenic patients receiving medical care.

Hospital & community psychiatry·1994

Same journal

An inpatient team's response to alleged sexual misconduct by an outpatient psychotherapist.

Hospital & community psychiatry·1994

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Psychiatry
Mental Health Advocacy
Bioethics

Background:

The patients' rights movement has been instrumental in advancing patient welfare.
However, the exercise of power by advocates without clinical responsibility can lead to adverse outcomes.
Unchecked advocacy may prioritize the struggle over patient well-being, particularly for the severely mentally ill.

Purpose of the Study:

To examine the potential negative consequences of patient advocacy lacking clinical insight.
To differentiate between responsible and irresponsible patient advocacy.
To propose measures for safeguarding long-term, severely mentally ill patients from harmful advocacy.

Main Methods:

Case study analysis of two advocacy situations.
Critical review of the role and impact of patient advocates.

Related Experiment Videos

Discussion of clinical complexities in treating severe mental illness.

Main Results:

Advocacy can be misdirected when advocates lack understanding of clinical realities.
In some cases, the advocacy process overshadowed the actual rights and welfare of patients.
Irresponsible advocacy poses a significant risk to vulnerable patient populations.

Conclusions:

Mental health professionals must critically evaluate advocacy, distinguishing responsible from irresponsible actions.
Advocates for the severely mentally ill should possess direct clinical experience.
Implementing screening processes for advocates is crucial to ensure patient safety and welfare.