Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The comparative stiffness of external fixation frames

G E Kempson, D Campbell

    Injury
    |January 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Endovascular treatment of bleeding external iliac artery pseudo-aneurysm following control of haemorrhage with Sengstaken tube during revision total hip arthroplasty.

    Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2007
    Same author

    Cautionary tales in the interpretation of systematic reviews of therapy trials.

    Internal medicine journal·2006
    Same author

    The analysis of 51 genes in DSM-IV combined type attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: association signals in DRD4, DAT1 and 16 other genes.

    Molecular psychiatry·2006
    Same author

    Effect of B vitamins and genetics on success of in-vitro fertilisation: prospective cohort study.

    Lancet (London, England)·2006
    Same author

    Primary mode of delivery and subsequent pregnancy.

    BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2005
    Same author

    Another case of anaphylaxis and fibrinolysis.

    Anaesthesia and intensive care·2005
    Same journal

    Impact of osteoporosis on outcomes following ankle open reduction and internal fixation.

    Injury·2026
    Same journal

    Cumulative traumatic life events and increased risk for emergency department and inpatient utilization after physical injury hospitalization.

    Injury·2026
    Same journal

    Advances in the management of chest wall injuries - Influence of new technical options.

    Injury·2026
    Same journal

    Trauma nursing as frontline health diplomacy: A binational ATCN program for Palestinian and Israeli nurses during conflict.

    Injury·2026
    Same journal

    Corrigendum to "Neutralizing the odds: Biomechanical protection by adiposity offsets physiological burden to explain the trauma.'obesity-paradox`" [Injury 57 (2) (2026) 112913].

    Injury·2026
    Same journal

    Agreement between ChatGPT and emergency physicians in laceration management: A prospective study.

    Injury·2026
    See all related articles

    The stiffness of external fixation frames is most influenced by pin diameter and number, not connecting bar stiffness. This research helps optimize fracture fixation device design.

    Area of Science:

    • Orthopedic biomechanics
    • Biomaterials science

    Background:

    • External fixation is crucial for treating unstable fractures.
    • Frame stiffness directly impacts fracture healing and stability.
    • Variability in bone quality can affect in vitro testing.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the stiffness of six external fixation frames.
    • To identify key design factors influencing frame stiffness.
    • To provide data for optimizing external fixation device design.

    Main Methods:

    • In vitro testing of external fixation frames on a simulated tibia fracture.
    • Measurement of frame deflection under load.
    • Repetition of tests using pins in a steel tube to control for bone variability.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Frame stiffness is primarily determined by pin diameter and the number of pins used.
    • Connecting bar stiffness has a secondary impact on overall frame stiffness.
    • Specific frame designs showed significant differences in stiffness.

    Conclusions:

    • Pin configuration (diameter and number) is the most critical factor for external fixation frame stiffness.
    • Design considerations should prioritize pin selection for optimal fracture stabilization.
    • Further research into optimal pin placement and material properties is warranted.