Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of endothelial evaluation techniques

R H Langston, T S Roisman

    Journal - American Intra-Ocular Implant Society
    |January 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    What is the risk of complications from cataract surgery in patients taking anticoagulants?

    Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine·2001
    Same author

    Management of the retinal impact site after intraocular foreign body trauma.

    Ophthalmology·2000
    Same author

    Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus endophthalmitis after cataract surgery with intraocular vancomycin.

    American journal of ophthalmology·1996
    Same author

    Ophthalmic irrigants: a current review and update.

    Ophthalmic surgery·1988
    Same author

    Corneal edema related to accidental Hibiclens exposure.

    American journal of ophthalmology·1988
    Same author

    Susceptibility of Acanthamoeba to soft contact lens disinfection systems.

    Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·1986

    Comparing corneal endothelium evaluation methods, the reticle-slitlamp combination closely matched specular microscopy cell counts. This method also offered time and cost savings, proving effective for polymegathism and cornea guttata assessment.

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Corneal Science
    • Microscopy

    Background:

    • Accurate assessment of the corneal endothelium is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring various eye conditions.
    • Specular microscopy is a standard but costly and time-consuming method for evaluating endothelial cell counts.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To comparatively evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of different methods for assessing the corneal endothelium.
    • To determine if a slitlamp with a reticle offers a viable alternative to traditional specular microscopy.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative study involving three methods: Heyer-Schulte specular photomicroscope, a slitlamp with the McIntyre CEB reticle, and a slitlamp alone.
    • Evaluation of endothelial cell counts, polymegathism, and cornea guttata.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The reticle-slitlamp combination achieved endothelial cell counts within a 10% average of specular microscopy results.
    • The reticle-slitlamp method demonstrated favorable time and cost savings.
    • All three methods were effective for observing polymegathism.
    • The slitlamp alone, due to lower magnification, was best suited for evaluating cornea guttata.

    Conclusions:

    • The McIntyre CEB reticle affixed to a slitlamp provides a cost-effective and time-efficient alternative for assessing corneal endothelial cell counts.
    • This combination method, along with slitlamp alone, remains effective for evaluating specific corneal conditions like polymegathism and cornea guttata.