Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Confounding: essence and detection

O S Miettinen, E F Cook

    American Journal of Epidemiology
    |October 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Understanding confounding in research is crucial. This study clarifies confounder definitions in follow-up and case-referent studies, emphasizing accurate identification to avoid misleading conclusions in epidemiological research.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Variation in Radiotherapy Referral and Treatment for High-risk Pathological Features after Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Population-based Study.

    Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2017
    Same author

    Quality of Radiation Therapy Referral and Utilisation Post-prostatectomy: A Population-based Study of Time Trends.

    Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2016
    Same author

    Screening for breast cancer: what truly is the benefit?

    Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique·2014
    Same author

    Drugs that inhibit gastric acid secretion may alter the course of inflammatory bowel disease.

    Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2012
    Same author

    The new Pharmacopoeia (XIII).

    The Merck report·2010
    Same author

    A simple risk score for predicting surgical site infections in inflammatory bowel disease.

    Diseases of the colon and rectum·2010
    Same journal

    Design and procedures for the greenness, cognitive performance and vascular outcomes in the northern Manhattan study (NOMAS-greenness).

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to: Home dampness and molds and occurrence of respiratory tract infections in the first 27 years of life: the Espoo Cohort Study.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    A SIMPLE AND POWERFUL TEST OF VACCINE WANING.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    Association Between maternal body mass index, offspring growth and pubertal timing: results from a longitudinal birth cohort study.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to: Developing a novel algorithm to identify incident and prevalent dementia in Medicare claims-the ARIC Study.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    RE: advancing observational research on arts and health: theory-informed approaches using the RADIANCE framework.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Epidemiology
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Confounding is a critical issue in observational studies.
    • Misidentification of confounders can lead to biased results.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To define confounding from first principles.
    • To differentiate confounder criteria in follow-up and case-referent studies.

    Main Methods:

    • Examination of confounding from fundamental principles.
    • Analysis of confounder roles as predictors of diagnosis and determinants of diagnostic errors.
    • Evaluation of confounder distributions between exposed/non-exposed and case/referent groups.

    Main Results:

    • In follow-up studies, confounders predict diagnosis and differ between exposed/non-exposed groups.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • In case-referent studies, a priori confounders correlate with exposure and influence diagnosis or selection.
  • Factors affecting exposure information accuracy are confounders if differentially distributed.

    • Conclusions:

    • Criteria based solely on data relationships or changes in estimates can be misleading.
    • A rigorous, principle-based approach is essential for accurate confounding identification.
    • Correctly identifying confounders is vital for valid epidemiological research findings.