Related Experiment Videos
Glycopyrrolate in children
British Journal of Anaesthesia
|December 1, 1981
Summary
Intravenous glycopyrrolate effectively reduced secretions during anesthesia compared to oral or intravenous atropine. Oral atropine increased secretions and cardiac arrhythmias, while IV glycopyrrolate offered superior antisialagogue effects.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Antisialagogue medications are crucial for managing secretions during anesthesia.
- Atropine and glycopyrrolate are commonly used, but their efficacy and side effect profiles differ based on administration route and timing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the antisialagogue effects and side effects of intravenous glycopyrrolate versus intravenous and oral atropine.
- To evaluate the impact on body temperature, heart rate, cardiac arrhythmias, and postoperative restlessness.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving three groups of patients undergoing anesthesia.
- Group 1: Intravenous glycopyrrolate (10 µg/kg) at induction.
- Group 2: Intravenous atropine (20 µg/kg) at induction.
- Group 3: Oral atropine (30 µg/kg) 90 minutes before operation.
- Measurements included pharyngeal secretions, axillary temperature, heart rate, cardiac arrhythmia frequency, and postoperative restlessness.
Main Results:
- Patients receiving oral atropine experienced increased pharyngeal secretions, lower heart rates, and a higher frequency of cardiac arrhythmias compared to intravenous administration.
- Intravenous glycopyrrolate demonstrated significantly reduced intraoperative secretions.
- No significant differences were noted in body temperature or postoperative restlessness between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Intravenous glycopyrrolate is a more effective antisialagogue agent during anesthesia than oral or intravenous atropine.
- Oral atropine administration is associated with increased secretions and a higher incidence of cardiac arrhythmias, suggesting potential risks.