Related Experiment Videos
Narcissism and adaptation to indignity
The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis
|January 1, 1981
Summary
This study critically evaluates Kernberg and Kohut's theories on narcissistic disorders, suggesting a need to balance empathy with traditional analytic tools and acknowledge life's universal narcissistic traumas.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Psychoanalytic Theory
Background:
- Compares and contrasts the contributions of Kernberg and Kohut to narcissistic disorder theory and treatment.
- Critically evaluates the merits and shortcomings of their approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate Kernberg and Kohut's theories on narcissistic problems.
- To examine the shift towards preverbal communication and the role of empathy in psychoanalysis.
- To discuss the implications for drive theory and the Oedipus complex.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of psychoanalytic theories.
- Critical evaluation of therapeutic approaches for narcissistic disorders.
- Review of developmental psychology and trauma literature.
Main Results:
- Identifies a tendency to overemphasize preverbal communication and empathy, potentially minimizing free association.
- Suggests that Kernberg and Kohut may have overemphasized countertransference dangers at the expense of adaptive communication.
- Posits that life presents universal narcissistic traumas beyond developmental conflicts.
Conclusions:
- Proposes a re-evaluation of psychoanalytic tools for narcissistic disorders, balancing empathy with established methods.
- Questions whether new self psychologies are needed or if existing theories require modification.
- Highlights the pervasive nature of narcissistic traumas throughout the lifespan, including the analytic patient experience.